Comparing the Undergraduate Experience of Engineers to All Other Majors: Significant Differences are Programmatic

Abstract

Background The authors partnered with the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to examine how persistence within the engineering major and engagement of undergraduate students in engineering compare to other majors. Purpose (Hypothesis) We explored three research questions: How do engineering students rate their college engagement compared to students in other majors? How do engineering persisters, non‐persisters, and migrators compare in terms of collegiate engagement, time on task, and enriching educational experiences? What college engagement factors predict persistence in engineering? Design/Method Data are from nearly 12,000 students who completed the NSSE survey in their first and senior years as undergraduates. Surveys were analyzed using ANOVA and Chi‐square calculations to determine whether differences emerged in three dimensions of student engagement based on students' self‐reported major. Due to the large sample, effect size was used to determine statistical significance. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors that predict persistence among first year students and seniors in engineering. Results Results show that engineering majors are similar to non‐engineering majors on most variables. However, engineering majors reported significantly higher gains in practical competence and higher order thinking, but the lowest means on reflective learning and gains in general education. Engineering majors reported significantly more time preparing for class and less time participating in educationally enriching experiences. Conclusions We conclude that different educational outcomes between majors are the result of programmatic differences. The packed engineering curriculum requires students to make trade‐offs between gaining practical/marketable skills and participating in educationally enriching activities. We question this trade‐off and suggest alternative approaches.

Work in Progress: Exploring the Role of Makerspaces and Flipped Learning in a Town-Gown Effort to Engage K12 Students in STEAM

“…In engineering, four interrelated factors have been noted as barriers to the persistence of academically talented students that face financial limitations, as is the case for many of our multicultural students 20,21,22 :…”

The Making of an Innovative Engineer: Academic and Life Experiences that Shape Engineering Task and Innovation Self-Efficacy

“…Most of these activities touched on elements of innovation and entrepreneurship, while others reflected more general aspects of the engineering student experience that may bear on students' career plans (see Brunhaver et al 2012;Lichtenstein et al 2010;Sheppard et al 2010). These learning experiences and activities were presented in roughly chronological order (high school to undergraduate) on the survey instrument.…”

Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out-of-Class Involvement

“…The construct was measured with a sixpoint Likert scale with response options ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Some of the sample items for factors that prevent participation include, scheduling issue (e.g., great workload of the engineering major), gender issues (e.g., females felt it is sometimes awkward to interact with male peers), lack of the knowledge about the opportunities, and the perceived culture of individualism (e.g., value personal goals above that of the group 40,41,22 ). …”