2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-013-9715-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Two Damage Models Under Shear Stress

Abstract: Recently, a new macro-mechanical model for ductile damage was presented by Wierzbicki, Xue et al., trying to address the role assumed by Lode angle and pressure sensitivity. The new model requires several experimental tests to identify all its parameters, but should outperform the "standard" formulations at high triaxiality levels. In this work a comparison between the Lemaitre's Continuous Damage Mechanics model and the Wierzbicki's one is proposed. After calibration of both models, the displacement field mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the time, this solution is acceptable, but sometimes the ability to better describe the boundaries of the area of interest is a significant improvement (see Fig. 2 for an example [2]). Thus, to fully exploit the potentiality of the mesh approach in describing the active region, we opted for removing the ''rectangular elements'' constraint; however, this choice poses two problems: the obvious one is the requirement for a general (simple) procedure for the identification of normalized coordinates in a general quadrilateral, because the shape of elements is no longer rectangular, the second being that the obvious solution, i.e.…”
Section: And 'mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the time, this solution is acceptable, but sometimes the ability to better describe the boundaries of the area of interest is a significant improvement (see Fig. 2 for an example [2]). Thus, to fully exploit the potentiality of the mesh approach in describing the active region, we opted for removing the ''rectangular elements'' constraint; however, this choice poses two problems: the obvious one is the requirement for a general (simple) procedure for the identification of normalized coordinates in a general quadrilateral, because the shape of elements is no longer rectangular, the second being that the obvious solution, i.e.…”
Section: And 'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 shows the corresponding mesh when no refinement is performed; to allow simple identification of the displacement field, all speckles inside a 200 pixel-wide border were disabled; moreover, to ensure that the code worked properly, the origin was moved to (250, 250), thus the speckled area includes a 50-pixel-large border. 2 In both analyses, the initial element size was set to about 20 Â 10 3 pixels whereas the minimum allowed element size for h-adaptivity was 225 pixels.…”
Section: Synthetic Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expanding use of finite elements (FE) meshes in digital image correlation (DIC) algorithms is explained by their ability to be coupled with numerical models. The interaction of measurement and simulation becomes fast and friendly, as both kinematic fields are defined at the nodes of the same mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the damage models applied in finite element models of shear tests should be composed of the stress triaxiality and the Lode's angle parameter. The comparisons of damage models based on the introduced key parameters was done for the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman's model in [4] and for the Lemaitre and Wierzbicki-Xue' model in [5]. The evaluation, calibration and validation of the damage models implemented in finite element shear tests is often carried out in experimental pure tensile conditions [4], digital image correlation tests [5] and in micro-double shear test coupled with simultaneous nanoindentation test [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%