Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1868914.1868935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing user interaction with low and high fidelity prototypes of tabletop surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing studies ( [4,5,11], among others), confirm the merits of this initial proposal to support collaborative learning around multi-touch tables. However, collaboration comes with its own challenges, including conflict due to group dynamics, ensuring equitable contribution, effectively supporting distributed tasks and transitioning back to whole group activity -challenges that may be compounded by limitations in the supporting technology [3,5,15].…”
Section: Research Objectivessupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Existing studies ( [4,5,11], among others), confirm the merits of this initial proposal to support collaborative learning around multi-touch tables. However, collaboration comes with its own challenges, including conflict due to group dynamics, ensuring equitable contribution, effectively supporting distributed tasks and transitioning back to whole group activity -challenges that may be compounded by limitations in the supporting technology [3,5,15].…”
Section: Research Objectivessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Studies show that multi-touch tables, a variant of large displays, foster collaboration, supporting social, interactive learning [3,11]. Touchtables are however still regarded as relatively new, and less accessible technology [4,5,15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a study using 16-17 year olds comparing low and high fidelity prototypes for tabletop surfaces [24], the findings suggest that one should be cautious in generalizing high-level user interactions from a low-fidelity prototype towards a high fidelity prototype. For example it was feasible to layer information on top of each other in a 3D space and this was not feasible in the 2D space.…”
Section: Prototype Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%