2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison among principal component, partial least squares and back propagation neural network analyses for accuracy of measurement of selected soil properties with visible and near infrared spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
242
2
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
13
242
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of the reflectance-based models using Scheme 7 and Scheme 8 are shown in Figure 6c,d. The former has a smaller absolute prediction bias and RPD, whereas the latter has an RPD value of greater than 2.0, which indicates a very good result [43]. The VIP scores of this model are shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparisons of the reflectance-based models using Scheme 7 and Scheme 8 are shown in Figure 6c,d. The former has a smaller absolute prediction bias and RPD, whereas the latter has an RPD value of greater than 2.0, which indicates a very good result [43]. The VIP scores of this model are shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Residual prediction deviation (RPD), along with the coefficient of determination (r 2 ) and the RMSE for the cross-validation (r 2 cv , RMSECV) and prediction (r 2 Pre , RMSEP), were computed to interpret the model predictive ability [42,43]. For the VNIR estimation of the soil properties, RPD > 1.4 indicates an acceptable predictive ability for the model [43].…”
Section: Plsr Modeling Of Soil Organic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is similar to the approach in previous studies for the determination of the optimal input number in PLS (Liu et al, 2010) and PCR (Serneels and Verdonck, 2009). However, this method contrasts with the approach that based on the cumulative percentage of explained data variance (Mouazen et al, 2010). Although the determination of the optimal PCs number still remains as an open question (Abdi and Williams, 2010), PCs with small variance (less than 0.1% variance) should not be ignored without proper investigation and evaluation.…”
Section: Optimal Number Of Principal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Mouazen et al (2010) advocated that ANN with latent variables (LVs) was the best when compared with PCs-ANN, PCR, and PLS models in soil property assessments. However, this is worth to highlight that latent variables are generally not recommended to be the inputs of ANN.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network With Principal Components (Pcs-ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the accuracy of SOC calibration models with VIS/NIR spectral data, the raw spectral data are often pre-processed before modeling [9,32,33]. Pre-processing is usually regarded as an integral part of chemometrics modeling with spectral data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%