2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and assessment of coarse resolution land cover maps for Northern Eurasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The updated data are for years [2005][2006], and 2009, including two images. With a nominal pixel size of 300-m × 300-m, GlobCover represents the highest spatial resolution global land cover dataset currently available [29]. The overall accuracy of GlobCover data weighted by the class area reaches 67.5% [48] and 73% [49].…”
Section: Validation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The updated data are for years [2005][2006], and 2009, including two images. With a nominal pixel size of 300-m × 300-m, GlobCover represents the highest spatial resolution global land cover dataset currently available [29]. The overall accuracy of GlobCover data weighted by the class area reaches 67.5% [48] and 73% [49].…”
Section: Validation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy [22] built a trajectory-based change detection method for automated characterization of forest disturbance dynamics. Then LandTrendr [23] and TimeSync [24] were further developed to detect trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series and applied widely [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, a fusion of machine-learning classifiers based on strata (e.g., soil types, landforms, administrative boundaries and further stratum-specific classifiers) may boost classification accuracy, particularly where one classifier is not able to accurately separate classes [36]. However, maps created with different classification methods but with similar accuracies may yield spatial disagreement of classified patterns, i.e., errors are rarely equally distributed in a map [49][50][51]. Thus, a major challenge for mapping large-scale, abandoned cropland is to achieve spatial continuity and consistency in the final map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they offer valuable information on LULC status, there are still important challenges for assessing and comparing these datasets, especially considering the discrepancies among these products and the different classification schemes applied (Jung et al, 2006). Moreover, even though there are several scientific papers assessing and comparing the classification accuracy of the available global land cover datasets (Brovelli et al, 2015;Büttner et al, 2012;EEA, 2006;Fritz and See, 2005;Giri et al, 2005;Jung et al, 2006;Kaptué Tchuenté et al, 2011;McCallum et al, 2006;Mora et al, 2014;Pflugmacher et al, 2011), there are few effective and user-friendly tools for visually comparing their similarities and discrepancies (EEA, 2016;ESRI Ireland, 2011;NGCC, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%