2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and improvement of tangent estimators on digital curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tn this comparison, we shall consider noisy ellipses and various performance criteria like precision, maximal error, isotropy, convergence, convexity on ideal digital shape, and time complexity [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tn this comparison, we shall consider noisy ellipses and various performance criteria like precision, maximal error, isotropy, convergence, convexity on ideal digital shape, and time complexity [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include corner detection, inflection curve which cannot be analyzed using equations [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commun way to link the estimated differential quantities to the expect Euclidean one is the multigrid convergence principle: when the shape is digitized on a grid with gridstep h tending to zero, the estimated quantity should converge to the expected one. In dimension 2, several multigrid convergent estimators have been introduced to approach normals [2,3] and curvatures [3][4][5]. In 3D, empirical methods for normal and curvature estimation have been introduced in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main variations in this approach are in vogue. The first variation is based on the theory of maximal segments [8]. At the point of interest, the maximal line segments passing through it are found and weighted convex combination of their slopes is 1057-7149 © 2014 IEEE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%