2004
DOI: 10.1626/pps.7.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Standardization among Chlorophyll Meters in their Readings on Rice Leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the SPAD-502 proved to be an effective tool for estimating total foliar concentration and content in plants of L. melissifolia across a range of plant ages, growing conditions, and genotypes, as well as, in the congener L. benzoin. However, different SPAD-502 meters may give different meter values (Huang & Peng 2004) and we suggest standardisation of a calibration curve prior to use on a plant population. Once this is determined, the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter may be used to gauge the progress of conservation practices by assessing and monitoring physiological variables that reflect the relative health of threatened and endangered plant species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the SPAD-502 proved to be an effective tool for estimating total foliar concentration and content in plants of L. melissifolia across a range of plant ages, growing conditions, and genotypes, as well as, in the congener L. benzoin. However, different SPAD-502 meters may give different meter values (Huang & Peng 2004) and we suggest standardisation of a calibration curve prior to use on a plant population. Once this is determined, the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter may be used to gauge the progress of conservation practices by assessing and monitoring physiological variables that reflect the relative health of threatened and endangered plant species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a digital chlorophyll meter (Soil and Plant Analyzer Development [SPAD] meter) provides a non-destructive method for estimating leaf chlorophyll content by measuring light absorption of specific spectral bands in living leaves (Watanabe et al 1980;Chubachi et al 1986). The methods for measurement of SPAD values are simple and quick, and close correlations between SPAD values and leaf photosynthesis values have been observed in rice (Huang and Peng 2004;Kato et al 2004;Kumagai et al 2009). Therefore, SPAD measurement may be a more appropriate method than destructive measurement of leaf chlorophyll content for use in genetic analysis of leaf photosynthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A few studies reported differences in SPAD‐502 values acquired from different chlorophyll meters (Marquard and Tipton, 1987; Huang and Peng, 2004), although Schaper and Chacko (1991) did not find differences between their two chlorophyll meters. Marquard and Tipton (1987) suggested using Wratten filters for meter comparisons, similar to what was done in this study with the Roscolux plastic filters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%