2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between body composition parameters and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by using pre-treatment PET CT in locally advanced breast cancer

Abstract: Weight and the BMI are inadequate proxies for adiposity that do not distinguish between muscle and adipose tissue or different specific deposits of adipose tissue (visceral and subcutaneous), which have different physiological effects. • Patients with the same BMI are likely to have different anatomical distribution of adipose and muscle tissue. • To our knowledge, only few studies have investigated the association between fat and muscle tissue distribution of the body, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of BoCo seems a more effective predictor of pharmacokinetics but unlike BMI, body composition requires instrumental measurements [27][28]. The majority of studies in cancer patients have used either CT-de ned skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) CT-based analysis or DXA scan, while the use of BIA has been very limited, even though this tool is easy to use, less expensive and without any radiation-associated risk [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of BoCo seems a more effective predictor of pharmacokinetics but unlike BMI, body composition requires instrumental measurements [27][28]. The majority of studies in cancer patients have used either CT-de ned skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) CT-based analysis or DXA scan, while the use of BIA has been very limited, even though this tool is easy to use, less expensive and without any radiation-associated risk [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%