2022
DOI: 10.3390/su141610375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models over MENA Region Using Historical Simulations and Future Projections

Abstract: The study evaluated the ability of 11 global climate models of the latest two versions of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6) to simulate observed (1965–2005) rainfall, maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures, mean eastward (uas) and northward (vas) wind speed, and mean surface pressure. It also evaluated relative uncertainty in projections of climate variables using those two CMIPs. The European reanalysis (ERA5) data were used as the reference to evaluate the performance of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this result highlights the potential value of careful management of water resources and demand-side measures in alleviating the water scarcity problem. Also, while the results are based on the AR5 climate data rather than on the most recent AR6 climate data, which have been shown to be less bias in the MENA region (Hamed et al, 2022), the finding that human systems dominate the scarcity signal in the MENA region is still robust given that the difference in renewable water supply due to climate change is much smaller than the delta in water demand (Table 1).…”
Section: Physical Assessment Of Climate Impacts On Water Scarcity In ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Importantly, this result highlights the potential value of careful management of water resources and demand-side measures in alleviating the water scarcity problem. Also, while the results are based on the AR5 climate data rather than on the most recent AR6 climate data, which have been shown to be less bias in the MENA region (Hamed et al, 2022), the finding that human systems dominate the scarcity signal in the MENA region is still robust given that the difference in renewable water supply due to climate change is much smaller than the delta in water demand (Table 1).…”
Section: Physical Assessment Of Climate Impacts On Water Scarcity In ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Where r is the Pearson correlation, γ is the fraction of the coefficient of variance, and β is the normalized bias with standard deviation [16], [24].…”
Section: Kling-gupta Efficiency (Kge)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the inadequacy of the CMIP5 and the regional dependence of MHWs require further study with improved numerical models. Hamed et al (2022) pointed out that most climate variables simulated in CMIP6 are less biased than in CMIP5. Preliminary studies show that the WNPCC region is one of the regions most affected by MHWs (Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Local Oceanic Current Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%