Comparison between conventional teaching and blended learning in preclinical fixed prosthodontic training: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract

Introduction: Blended learning utilizes technology with reduced face-to-face time and promotes a student-centred learning environment that excites the learning process. However, studies on blended learning in fixed prosthodontics is still lacking.This study aimed to compare students' performance in easy and difficult level of fixed prosthodontic preclinical projects given by either blended learning or conventional teaching. Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted on 72 s-year dental students, who attended preclinical fixed prosthodontic training. Participants were randomly segregated into conventional teaching (n = 36) and blended learning (n = 36). All participants were evaluated for learning preferences using Visual-Aural-Read/Write-Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire and performed a project as their baseline skill assessment. They performed another two preclinical projects (easy and difficult level) after the allocated teaching approach. Learning preferences were analysed using Fisher's exact test and performance in preclinical projects were analysed with an independent t test (significant at p < .05). Results:The highest prevalence of learning preferences was the quad-modal preferences (50.7%), which were visual, auditory, reading/writing and kinesthetic. There were no significant differences in baseline skills and learning preferences (p > .05) between groups. No significant differences found between both teaching approaches for easy (p = .319) and difficult projects (p = .339). In the blended learning group, no significant difference was found in both difficulty level of projects (p = .064). Conclusion:The participants performed equally on both teaching approaches. However, blended learning for preclinical fixed prosthodontics is anticipated as the new norm of learning, especially in the current pandemic with reduced face-to-face time.

Learning technology in health professions education: Realising an (un)imagined future

“…Of the 297 articles, we categorised 113 as using technology as a substitute for previous methods of teaching the same material. Examples of substitution included the use of technologies for blended learning to combine online activities with face-to-face activities [72][73][74][75][76][77][78] or the use of elearning modules to take the place of face-to-face learning. 21,22,24 Other areas where substitution took place included the development of electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (eOSCES) 31,32,35,36,79 and learning resources such as ebooks.…”

Evaluating the patient sociodemographic factors affecting dental students' clinical communication skills using a three‐perspective approach

“…It is evident that dental student clinicians' communication skills are essential for enhancing patient satisfaction. Some of the findings from this cross‐sectional study, including the sex of students, years of clinical experience, and clinical setting, have been previously published (Ab Ghani et al, 2023). Numerous patient factors influence the delivery of information and the effectiveness of communication between clinicians and patients.…”

Evaluation of the Prosthodontic Clinical Internship Experiences of 4th and 5th Grade Dentistry Students: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…There are numerous studies about the clinical competencies and knowledge levels in dentistry students. 12,[17][18][19][20] In addition, there are studies in which dentistry students evaluated their own treatments. 21,22 There are also some studies which evaluated educational perspectives and compared clinical educations.…”