2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40745-020-00302-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Dependent and Independent Ranked Set Sampling Designs for Parametric Estimation with Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, [7] studied Weibull and Pareto distributions, [8] introduced the maximum likelihood estimation of the modified Weibull distribution parameters using extreme ranking set sampling, [9], [10] and [11].and a -stage RSS design uses +1 sample units from the target population to produce a sample of size after stages of ranking developed [12]. For more details, see [13], [14], [15] and [16], see more [17], [18] and [19].…”
Section: Figure 1 Pdf Of the Epgw Distribution For Different Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, [7] studied Weibull and Pareto distributions, [8] introduced the maximum likelihood estimation of the modified Weibull distribution parameters using extreme ranking set sampling, [9], [10] and [11].and a -stage RSS design uses +1 sample units from the target population to produce a sample of size after stages of ranking developed [12]. For more details, see [13], [14], [15] and [16], see more [17], [18] and [19].…”
Section: Figure 1 Pdf Of the Epgw Distribution For Different Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1and Table 2 lists the results of bias and MSE for different estimators, table (3) lists the efficiency results, and Figure (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) shows the simulation results. The following conclusions can be observed from Table (1-2) 1) It is small biases in almost all cases…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%