Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy 2018
DOI: 10.1115/omae2018-77694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Experiments and a Multibody Weakly Nonlinear Potential Flow Approach for Modeling of Marine Operations

Abstract: This paper presents validation tests for a new numerical tool for the numerical simulation of marine operations. It involves multibody dynamics modeling, wave-structure interactions with large amplitude body motion and cable’s dynamic modeling. Hydrodynamic loads are computed using the WS_CN weakly nonlinear potential flow solver, based on the weak-scatterer hypothesis. Large deformation of the wetted body surfaces can be taken into account. Firstly the ECN’s WS_CN solver capabilities are extended to multibody… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WSA was pioneered by Pawlowski for nonlinear ship hydrodynamics in the early 1990s [178] but has only been applied to WECs in the past decade. The first usage is reported in Bretl [165] to assess the performance of a small scale data buoy equipped with an oscillating pendulum PTO, then in Merigaud et al [168] for a comparison against linear Cummins and NLFK models, and as then via the WSA code, under development at Ecole Central de Nantes (ECN) [170][171][172][179][180][181][182]. Letournel [179] developed a WSA model, for submerged bodies, and an early-stage comparison against an FNPF BEM solver is presented in [180], for the case of prescribed motion of a submerged cylinder, showing good agreement and roughly an order of magnitude speed increase.…”
Section: Weakly Nonlinear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WSA was pioneered by Pawlowski for nonlinear ship hydrodynamics in the early 1990s [178] but has only been applied to WECs in the past decade. The first usage is reported in Bretl [165] to assess the performance of a small scale data buoy equipped with an oscillating pendulum PTO, then in Merigaud et al [168] for a comparison against linear Cummins and NLFK models, and as then via the WSA code, under development at Ecole Central de Nantes (ECN) [170][171][172][179][180][181][182]. Letournel [179] developed a WSA model, for submerged bodies, and an early-stage comparison against an FNPF BEM solver is presented in [180], for the case of prescribed motion of a submerged cylinder, showing good agreement and roughly an order of magnitude speed increase.…”
Section: Weakly Nonlinear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bozonnet et al [171], the WSA model is then applied to a scaled Wavestar float, demonstrating similar results to experiments and an NLFK model. Wuillaume et al [170,182] couple the WSA model with an advanced multibody theory mechanical solver, inWave, to investigate simulating marine operations, performing a verification of the coupling procedure through a test case on a CETO type WEC in [170]. The method is extended in [182], to handle the case of multiple interacting floating bodies, by introducing a remeshing technique, which is validated against experiments for a test case involving two cylinders in regular waves.…”
Section: Weakly Nonlinear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the governing equations of the weakly nonlinear potential flow theory based on the weak-scatterer theory are described. More details may be found in [6,7,8].…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some slight differences are observed, probably due to the permanent remeshing process in the new mesh generator whereas, in the initial mesh strategy, the mesh is only deformed if the regeneration is not necessary. The remeshing involves an interpolation between the old and the new mesh as explained in [8] and so numerical errors may occur.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation