1998
DOI: 10.1080/028418698430043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Fractionated High Dose Rate Irradiation and Continuous Low Dose Rate Irradiation in Spheroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, therapeutic doses can be applied in radiation times well below 1 h. In contrast, radiation dose in RIT is deposited during several days, with continuously decreasing dose rate. Because higher dose rate is more effective in achieving cell damage [5][6][7], it might be assumed that this difference accounts for the extremely high doses necessary in RIT as compared to conventional radiation, to achieve elimination of the target volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, therapeutic doses can be applied in radiation times well below 1 h. In contrast, radiation dose in RIT is deposited during several days, with continuously decreasing dose rate. Because higher dose rate is more effective in achieving cell damage [5][6][7], it might be assumed that this difference accounts for the extremely high doses necessary in RIT as compared to conventional radiation, to achieve elimination of the target volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human squamous lung cancer cell line SQ5 was donated by Dr Kubota of the Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences. (15) Both cell lines were maintained in αMEM medium (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) with l-glutamine supplemented with 10% heatinactivated fetal bovine serum (Equitech-Bio, Kerrville, TX, USA), 50 units/mL penicillin, and 50 µg/mL streptomycin. Cells were maintained in exponential growth in humidified incubators at 37°C and 5% CO 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intraperitoneal administration of radioactivity would likely yield treatment protocols of several days. As such, a more detailed approach would require the use of a model that incorporates the effects of the cell cycle, including repopulation (Zaider and Minerbo 2000, Howell et al 1998, Dale 1996, Omura et al 1998. Furthermore, the radiation sensitivity of cells within micrometastases would show variability, particularly in spheroids large enough to produce hypoxic centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%