2013 13th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO 2013) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/nano.2013.6721024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between front- and back-gating of Silicon Nanoribbons in real-time sensing experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SiNR chip is coupled with a microfluidic module that employs Ag/AgCl reference electrodes (REs) and allows subsequent injections of different solutions into sub-5 µL microchannels ( Figure 1 c) [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SiNR chip is coupled with a microfluidic module that employs Ag/AgCl reference electrodes (REs) and allows subsequent injections of different solutions into sub-5 µL microchannels ( Figure 1 c) [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in the case of front-gating, a voltage V FG-S is applied between the electrolyte solution, biased by Ag/AgCl REs, and the source terminal, while the back-gate is short-circuited with the source contact. As shown in our previous work [ 37 ], the front-gating configuration with grounded back-gate prevents from any parasitic coupling between the electrolyte solution and the environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%