Comparison Between Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Panic Disorder on Metacognitive Beliefs, Emotional Schemas, and Cognitive Flexibility

Oğuz, Gülay; Çelikbaş, Zekiye; Batmaz, Sedat; Çağlı, Saime; Sungur, Mehmet Z.

doi:10.1007/s41811-019-00047-5

Cited by 18 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To be concrete, excessive worry was specially related to generalize anxiety disorder symptoms, rumination with depresssion symptoms, and biased metacognitive thoughts with panic disorder ones. This is consistent with other works that have also detected a more powerful link between worry for generalized anxiety disorder (Borkovec & Inz, 1990;Makovac et al, 2016;Thayer et al, 1996), ruminative thoughts for depression (Gibb et al, 2012;Piraman et al, 2016) and negative metacognitive beliefs about uncontrollability and danger for panic disorder (Cucchi et al, 2012;Oguz et al, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Cognitive processes associated with emotional disorders: implications for efficient psychological treatments

Corpas

Moriana

Martínez

et al. 2021

Journal of Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Emotional disorders are the most prevalent worldwide. Despite psychotherapies are their treatment of choice, there are difficulties to apply them property in mental health services. Since literature shows that cognitive processes are associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms, more information is needed in order to improve psychological treatments.Aims: To determine the relation between cognitive factors with specific and non-specific emotional disorder symptoms in order to promote the development of accurate psychological treatments.Methods: We analyzed the relation between rumination, worry, and metacognition with generalized anxiety, panic, and depression disorder symptoms from a clinical sample of 116 individuals through correlation and linear regression analyses.Results: Although each specific disorder had a closer link with a particular cognitive process, all general emotional disorder symptoms were associated with the three cognitive factors studied. Conclusions: For "pure" disorders, targeting a concrete cognitive process might be an optimal therapeutic option. However, due to the high comorbidity among emotional disorders, we support the dissemination of the transdiagnostic treatment approach in which all cognitive factors are taken into account.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Cognitive processes associated with emotional disorders: implications for efficient psychological treatments

Corpas

Moriana

Martínez

et al. 2021

Journal of Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Conversely, we found that PD groups did not have significantly higher total rumination scores compared with healthy controls. This finding contradicts that of Oguz et al (2019; also included in the present review), which found significantly higher rumination in PD patients compared with healthy controls. The lack of significant differences in the present review may be due to reduced reliability of effect sizes because of the small number of studies available for inclusion (compared with MDD, SAD, and GAD).…”

Section: Group Differences In Ruminationcontrasting

confidence: 99%

Rumination across depression, anxiety, and eating disorders in adults: A meta-analytic review.

Rickerby¹,

Krug²,

Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz³

et al. 2024

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We examined whether rumination, brooding, and reflection differed between patients with depression, anxiety, and eating disorders and healthy controls. We also examined correlations between psychopathology and rumination, brooding, and reflection. Systematic searches of four electronic databases from July 2008 to December 2021 identified 585 abstracts that were eligible for full text review and 99 were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with healthy controls, rumination was significantly higher in major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), and anorexia nervosa (AN). Brooding was also higher in MDD, GAD, and SAD and reflection was higher in MDD and SAD. Significant medium to large correlations were found between psychopathology and rumination for MDD, GAD, and SAD. Psychopathology was correlated with brooding and reflection in MDD and brooding in SAD. These findings indicate that total rumination is strongly associated with MDD, SAD, GAD, and AN, brooding is strongly associated with MDD, SAD and GAD, and reflection is strongly associated with MDD and SAD.

show abstract

“…Together, these findings suggest that poor cognitive flexibility could potentially be a transdiagnostic feature of various clinical conditions. Self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility have been used as, or implied to be, interchangeable assessments of the same construct (e.g., Abbate-Daga et al, 2014;Fujino et al, 2019;Oguz et al, 2019;Tchanturia et al, 2012). Inherent to such perspectives is the idea that the capacities targeted by self-report tests of cognitive flexibility underpin the ability to perform neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility (Abbate- Daga et al, 2014;Holliday et al, 2005;Tchanturia et al, 2012) and are therefore interchangeable in clinical and research contexts.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Back to the drawing board—The relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility in clinical cohorts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Howlett¹,

Wewege²,

Berryman³

et al. 2022

Neuropsychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Cognitive flexibility has been previously described as the ability to adjust cognitive and behavioral strategies in response to changing contextual demands. Cognitive flexibility is typically assessed via self-report questionnaires and performance on neuropsychological tests in research and clinical practice. A common assumption among researchers and clinicians is that self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility assess the same or similar constructs, but the extent of the relationship between these two assessment approaches in clinical cohorts remains unknown. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility in clinical samples. Method: We searched 10 databases and relevant gray literature (e.g., other databases and pearling) from inception to October 2020 and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. Eleven articles including 405 participants satisfied our eligibility criteria. Results: A multilevel random-effects meta-analysis revealed no relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility (0.01, 95% CI [−0.16 to 0.18]). Individual random-effects meta-analyses between 12 different tests pairs also found no relationship. Conclusion: Based on our results, it is clear that the two assessment approaches of cognitive flexibility provide independent information—they do not assess the same construct. These findings have important ramifications for future research and clinical practice—there is a need to reconsider what constructs self-report and neuropsychological tests of “cognitive flexibility” actually assess, and avoid the interchangeable use of these assessments in clinical samples.

show abstract

Comparison Between Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Panic Disorder on Metacognitive Beliefs, Emotional Schemas, and Cognitive Flexibility

Cited by 18 publications

References 71 publications

Cognitive processes associated with emotional disorders: implications for efficient psychological treatments

Cognitive processes associated with emotional disorders: implications for efficient psychological treatments

Rumination across depression, anxiety, and eating disorders in adults: A meta-analytic review.

Back to the drawing board—The relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility in clinical cohorts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About