2008
DOI: 10.1515/acv.2008.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between second variation of area and second variation of energy of a minimal surface

Abstract: We show that the difference between the Morse index of a closed minimal surface as a critical point of the area functional and its Morse index as a critical point of the energy is at most the real dimension of Teichmüller space. This enables us to bound the index of a closed minimal surface in an arbitrary Riemannian manifold by the area and genus of the surface, and the dimension and geometry of the ambient manifold. Our method also yields surprisingly good upper bounds on the index of a minimal surface of fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Corollary 1.3 and the results from [7,3] show that in the case of bounded area, a bound on the Morse index is (qualitatively) equivalent to a bound on the total curvature.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, Corollary 1.3 and the results from [7,3] show that in the case of bounded area, a bound on the Morse index is (qualitatively) equivalent to a bound on the total curvature.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are many known relationships between the index of minimal submanifolds and their topological and analytic properties. In particular, given an immersed minimal submanifold in a closed Riemannian manifold, one knows that the Morse index is bounded linearly from above in terms of area and total curvature, see Ejiri-Micallef [7] for n = 2 and Cheng-Tysk [3] for n ≥ 3. Moreover, for properly immersed minimal hypersurfaces in Euclidean space, we have the same result -except this time the upper bound is purely in terms of the total curvature (and thus implicitly contains information on the number of ends the minimal hypersurface has).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we explain how our main results imply a qualitative version of the fact that finite index is equivalent to finite total curvature. Theorems 1.1 and 1.3, combined with the Jorge-Meeks formula yield the following result (the upper bound is due 5 to Ejiri-Micallef [EM08]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the uniqueness proof it is necessary to show that the energy has high enough index, so in order to do this we solve a Cauchy-Riemann equation on to add a tangential component to certain normal variations to make them conformal. We note that a systematic study of the relationship between second variation of energy and area was done by Ejiri and Micallef [5].…”
Section: Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 94%