Comparison Between Suction and Free-Drainage Soil Solution Samplers1

Barbee, G. C.; Brown, K. W.

doi:10.1097/00010694-198602000-00008

Cited by 108 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Different methods have been employed to assess N leaching in unsaturated soils [32][33][34][35]. The soil core method used in this study is simple, relatively inexpensive, widely used and applicable to most soils [36].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water Footprint of Industrial Tomato Cultivations in the Pinios River Basin: Soil Properties Interactions

Evangelou

Tsadilas

Tserlikakis

et al. 2016

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industrial tomatoes are cultivated in about 4000 ha of the Pinios river basin (central Greece), providing significant income to the farmers. In this study, the water footprint (WF) of industrial tomatoes between planting and harvest was estimated in 24 different farms for three consecutive years. The selected farms were representative of the main agro-climatic zones and soil textural classes within the river basin. Green, blue and grey WF calculations were based on datasets of the experimental plots for each farm, including irrigation water volume, meteorological, soil, and crop yield data. The results showed that the WF of tomatoes ranged from 37 to 131 m 3 water/ton tomatoes with an average of 61 m 3 /ton. The WF variation depended mainly on crop yield, local agro-climatic and soil conditions. The green, blue, and grey WF components averaged 13, 27 and 21 m 3 /ton, respectively. The results reveal the importance of WF in understanding how tomato production relates to the sustainable use of freshwater and pollution at local level.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water Footprint of Industrial Tomato Cultivations in the Pinios River Basin: Soil Properties Interactions

Evangelou

Tsadilas

Tserlikakis

et al. 2016

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Barbee and Brown (1986) observed that pan samplers generally gave larger and more consistent samples than the porous cups in loamy sand and silt loam soils at high soil moisture potentials. In addition, samples collected through this method may reveal preferential flow (Schoen et al 1999).…”

mentioning

confidence: 91%

“…However, several problems associated with the use of this method are also well documented (Barbee and Brown 1986;Grossmann and Udluft 1991;Li et al 1993).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Detection of nitrate leaching through bypass flow using pan lysimeter, suction cup, and resin capsule

Pampolino

Urushiyama

Hatano

2000

Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…De nombreuses études ont ré-vélé des différences dans leurs compositions chimiques (Vedy et Bruckert, 1979 ;Bonne et al, 1982; Barbee et Brown, 1986 ; Gras, 1988 ; Zabowski, 1989 ;Zabowski et Ugolini, 1990 (Adams, 1974).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Comparaison des eaux liées et des eaux libres des sols de 3 peuplements d'épicéa (Picea abies Karst) des Vosges. Application à l'étude du fonctionnement actuel des sols et conséquences pour l'état sanitaire des peuplements

et al. 1993

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison Between Suction and Free-Drainage Soil Solution Samplers1

Cited by 108 publications

References 0 publications

Water Footprint of Industrial Tomato Cultivations in the Pinios River Basin: Soil Properties Interactions

Water Footprint of Industrial Tomato Cultivations in the Pinios River Basin: Soil Properties Interactions

Detection of nitrate leaching through bypass flow using pan lysimeter, suction cup, and resin capsule

Comparaison des eaux liées et des eaux libres des sols de 3 peuplements d'épicéa (Picea abies Karst) des Vosges. Application à l'étude du fonctionnement actuel des sols et conséquences pour l'état sanitaire des peuplements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About