2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl000026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between SUPIM simulations and measured TEC for the January, 1997 storm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also see other periods of enhancements (e.g., January 21), but these periods do not persist in time. Even though we are not including the topside electron density contribution, we believe the F-region densities we are using, are good proxies of the TEC behavior during this period [e.g., MacPherson et al, 2000]. As we see later, the TEC obtained from GPS also show similar features.…”
Section: Incoherent Scatter Radar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We also see other periods of enhancements (e.g., January 21), but these periods do not persist in time. Even though we are not including the topside electron density contribution, we believe the F-region densities we are using, are good proxies of the TEC behavior during this period [e.g., MacPherson et al, 2000]. As we see later, the TEC obtained from GPS also show similar features.…”
Section: Incoherent Scatter Radar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although the protonospheric contribution to TEC is mostly noticeable at mid latitudes and during solar maximum, it is worthwhile to mention that a small amount of the TEC estimated for PP may has build in a protonospheric contribution not present in the ionospheric electron content (IEC). MacPherson et al (2000) found a remarkable plasmaspheric contribution over Arecibo on a magnetically disturbed period (Jan. 9-10, 1997, Dst index of -78 nT). On the other hand, Makela et al (2000) argue that for summer conditions, the plasmaspheric contribution to the TEC is of the order of 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, Makela et al (2000) argue that for summer conditions, the plasmaspheric contribution to the TEC is of the order of 20%. MacPherson et al (2000) believe that the reason for such differences in plasmaspheric contributions is a seasonal effect driven by the relative changes in the topside ion densities which are reversed from winter to summer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research efforts on ionospheric data assimilation began in 1996 as a collaborative research project involving the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), University of Southern California (USC), Cornell University, and University of Sheffield. As an exploratory research project, our goal was to explore the feasibility of combining ground and space‐based GPS total electron current (TEC) measurements with the theoretical Sheffield Plasmaspheric and Ionospheric Model (SUPIM) [ Bailey and Sellek , 1990; MacPherson et al , 2000] to produce ionospheric specifications and forecasts. In 1999 a MURI project supported the development of the Global Assimilative Ionospheric Model (GAIM) by two consortia, one led by USC/JPL and the other led by Utah State University.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%