2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the findings of Deep Impact and our experimental results on large samples of gas-laden amorphous ice

Abstract: The findings of Deep Impact on the structure and composition of Tempel-1 are compared with our experimental results on large (20 cm diameter and up to 10 cm high) samples of gas-laden amorphous ice. The mechanical ∼tensile strength inferred for Tempel-1: ∼65 Pa is 30 to 60 times smaller than our experimental findings of 2-4 kPa. This means that Tempel-1 is even fluffier than our very fluffy, talcum like, ice sample. The thermal inertia: I < 100 W K −1 m −2 s 1/2 is very close to our value of 80. The density of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hornung et al (2016) recently reported the collection of cometary dust particles at low-impact velocities using the COSIMA instrument on the ROSETTA spacecraft, from which they deduced the pressure required for fragmentation (i.e., the tensile strength) to be between~0.8 and 14 kPa. Other modeling and observational studies of cometary material tensile strengths on the 10-100 μm scale are in agreement with these values (Bar-Nun et al, 2007;Biele et al, 2009).…”
Section: Meteoroid Fragmentationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Hornung et al (2016) recently reported the collection of cometary dust particles at low-impact velocities using the COSIMA instrument on the ROSETTA spacecraft, from which they deduced the pressure required for fragmentation (i.e., the tensile strength) to be between~0.8 and 14 kPa. Other modeling and observational studies of cometary material tensile strengths on the 10-100 μm scale are in agreement with these values (Bar-Nun et al, 2007;Biele et al, 2009).…”
Section: Meteoroid Fragmentationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…, where Ȳ is the effective yield strengths of the target material. We adopt a value of Ȳ ≈ 10P a, as determined for comet Temple 1 and also in agreement with laboratory experiments (Richardson et al 2007, Bar-Nun et al 2007. Under the assumptions used previously, the depth of this crater for an impactor of size 10µm is 600µm, i.e., roughly the penetration depth of the solar protons.…”
Section: Timescale Of Collisional Re-surfacingmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…From laboratory experiments, it is possible to measure the strengths of cometary material analogs, with the strong limitation that we do not know well the nature of the cometary material, therefore the ground truth of the studied analogs. Various analogs made of water ice grains and/or dust grains have been studied, with an estimated tensile strength in the range 2 -4 kPa for pure 200 micron size water ice grains (Bar-Nun et al 2007) and in the range 1 -10 kPa for micrometre size siliceous grains (Blum et al 2006). The compressive strength has also been estimated to 0.3 -1 MPa by Jessberger and Kotthaus (1989) for micron size low density aggregates of water ice and dust grains.…”
Section: State Of the Art Before Rosettamentioning
confidence: 99%