2007
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the Gene Expression Profile of Human Müller Cells and Two Spontaneous Müller Cell Lines

Abstract: The SAGE libraries reported in this article provide the gene expression profile of NHMCs and HMLCs. It thus represents a valuable source of information regarding the function of Müller cells as well as their role in the development of diabetic retinopathy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence indicates that the glial and neural cells of the retina are also affected 24. This notion is consistent with our data, in that we observed several genes related to neurogenesis such as MTCH1 , SOD1 , S100A6 and BAIAP2 in the library, which is indicative of immature glial cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Recent evidence indicates that the glial and neural cells of the retina are also affected 24. This notion is consistent with our data, in that we observed several genes related to neurogenesis such as MTCH1 , SOD1 , S100A6 and BAIAP2 in the library, which is indicative of immature glial cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…During the onset and progression of diseases, extensive changes take place in gene expression [17]. By comparing gene expression profiles under different conditions, individual genes or group of genes that play important roles in a particular disease process can be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Key for references:1=Al-Ubaidi et al 2008; 2= Bonilha et al 2004; 3= Dean et al1999; 4= Diehn et al 2005; 5=Ferrington et al 2008; 6=Fimbel et al 2007; 7=Fokina and Frolova 2006; 8=Hargrave 2001; 9=Hauck et al 2003; 10=Helle et al 2003; 11=Huang et al 2004; 12=Imamura et al 2006; 13=Ivanov et al 2006; 14=Lewis et al 1989; 15=Lupien et al 2007; 16=Moscona et al 1970; 17=Saari 2000; 18=Tsai 2006; 19=West et al 2001; 20=Whelan and McGinnis 1988; 21= the present study. …”
Section: Figures and Tablesmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…A literature review revealed that 17 of the proteins that were differentially expressed under our experimental conditions are known to be expressed by and play a functional role in the eye (see Table 1 for expression patterns in various cell types). Those proteins are: HSPA8 (Al-Ubaidi et al 2008; Dean et al 1999), HSPD1 (Al-Ubaidi et al 2008; West et al 2001), ATP5B (Al-Ubaidi et al 2008; Lupien et al 2007; West et al 2001), PCNA (Fimbel et al 2007), RLBP1 (Saari 2000), GNB1 (Al-Ubaidi et al 2008; Lupien et al 2007; Whelan and McGinnis 1988), YWHAZ (Ivanov et al 2006) (West et al 2001), PSMA1 (Ferrington et al 2008), NDUFS3 (Huang et al 2004; Lupien et al 2007), WNT2 (Fokina and Frolova 2006), LYZ (Bonilha et al 2004; Tsai et al 2006), RBP1 (Saari 2000), FABP7 (Hauck et al 2003; Helle et al 2003), SOD1 (Diehn et al 2005; Huang et al 2004; Imamura et al 2006) (Lupien et al 2007), RHO (Hargrave 2001), CRKRS (http://www.dsi.univ-paris5.fr/genatlas/fiche.php?n=30221), GLUL (Moscona et al 1970), and GFAP (Lewis et al 1989). It is striking that Müller cells rather than photoreceptors express the vast majority of differentially expressed proteins, 14 of 17 and 6 of 17, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%