2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Two Different Scanners for the Evaluation of the Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT Semiquantitative Parameters and Radiomics Features in the Prediction of Final Diagnosis of Thyroid Incidentalomas

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare two different tomographs for the evaluation of the role of semiquantitative PET/CT parameters and radiomics features (RF) in the prediction of thyroid incidentalomas (TIs) at 18F-FDG imaging. A total of 221 patients with the presence of TIs were retrospectively included. After volumetric segmentation of each TI, semiquantitative parameters and RF were extracted. All of the features were tested for significant differences between the two PET scanners. The performances of all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common tracer used to perform such a diagnostic procedure is 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG), which has the ability to reveal hypermetabolic lesions based on their increased glycolytic metabolism. As a consequence, [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT has proven its role to assess neoplastic disease both in staging and restaging settings [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. However, its usefulness for the evaluation of inflammatory and infectious diseases has also emerged, in particular in the last decade [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common tracer used to perform such a diagnostic procedure is 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG), which has the ability to reveal hypermetabolic lesions based on their increased glycolytic metabolism. As a consequence, [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT has proven its role to assess neoplastic disease both in staging and restaging settings [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. However, its usefulness for the evaluation of inflammatory and infectious diseases has also emerged, in particular in the last decade [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher feature reproducibility was observed for polystyrene phantom images but for different MR scanners (the obtained reproducibility was over 92% for the investigated 1.5T devices and ~80% for 3T scanners in terms of intraclass and concordance correlation coefficients) [26]. Of interest is that reproducibility of some texture parameters between two different scanners was also confirmed in [27], where predictive values of such features were investigated to discriminate benign and malignant thyroid incidentalomas in PET/CT imaging. The repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features in MR imaging (MRI), including the derived texture, have been the objectives of many studies; these studies were mostly performed on phantoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Third, variations in imaging protocols were not investigated. Since inter-scanner variability (time resolution, detector sensitivity correction, dead time correction, random and scatter coincidence corrections, attenuation correction, and image reconstruction) has been reported to affect conventional features extracted from CT [ 39 , 40 ] and PET images [ 41 , 42 ], the impact of these factors on PH features will be further examined in our future studies. Streak artifacts, which can decrease the performance of radiomic models [ 43 ], were not examined in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%