2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between VHF radar observations and data from drifter clusters in the Gulf of La Spezia (Mediterranean Sea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can explain the significant scatter found in the literature concerning point to point comparison between HFR and other in situ measurements. When HFR data are compared with surface drifter clusters or ADCPs whose uppermost bins are not deeper than 5 m, RMSDs typical values range between 3 and 12 cm.s −1 (e.g., Ohlmann et al, 2007;Molcard et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2010;Kalampokis et al, 2016). Each row corresponds to one of the ITU frequency bands allocated for oceanographic radar with the lower and upper band limits in frequency.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Hfr Operation and Data Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can explain the significant scatter found in the literature concerning point to point comparison between HFR and other in situ measurements. When HFR data are compared with surface drifter clusters or ADCPs whose uppermost bins are not deeper than 5 m, RMSDs typical values range between 3 and 12 cm.s −1 (e.g., Ohlmann et al, 2007;Molcard et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2010;Kalampokis et al, 2016). Each row corresponds to one of the ITU frequency bands allocated for oceanographic radar with the lower and upper band limits in frequency.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Hfr Operation and Data Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, the number of systems is growing with over 50 HFRs currently deployed and a number in the planning stage. Nowadays, these systems are integrated in many European coastal observatories with proven potential for monitoring (e.g., Wyatt et al, 2006;Molcard et al, 2009;Berta et al, 2014b) and even providing short-term prediction of coastal currents (e.g., Orfila et al, 2015;Solabarrieta et al, 2016;Vilibić et al, 2016), and inputs for data assimilation and the validation and calibration of numerical ocean forecasting models, especially near the coast (e.g., Barth et al, 2008Barth et al, , 2011Marmain et al, 2014;Stanev et al, 2015;Iermano et al, 2016). The growing number of HFRs, the optimization of HFR operation against technical hitches and the need for complex data processing and analysis, highlight the urgent requirement to increase the coordination in the HFR community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in , HF-radar measurements are affected by intrinsic uncertainties (like radio wave interferences, antenna pattern distortions or environmental noise), and reliability of HFradar data has been previously tested in several validation studies including comparisons of HF-radar-derived surface currents with moored ADCP's, point-wise current meters and Lagrangian drifters (Ohlmann et al, 2007;Molcard et al, 2009;Shaden et al, 2009).…”
Section: G Sotillo Et Al: the Medess-gib Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences are quantified in terms of bias error and RMS error, where bias error b is b= < udiff > and RMS error is where u diff = u radar -u drifter averaged over time, the < > symbols denote averaging, u radar the radar-derived radial velocity and u drifter the radial component of the velocity obtained from the drifter track (Molcard et al, 2009). The (bii) comparison provides an overall evaluation of the final HF-radar derived velocity fields.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%