2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-014-0878-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between visual assessment of dopaminergic degeneration pattern and semi-quantitative ratio calculations in patients with Parkinson’s disease and Atypical Parkinsonian syndromes using DaTSCAN® SPECT

Abstract: In this study, we found that in more than half of the patients it was possible to differentiate between PD and APS by visual interpretation only. Similar results were obtained using semi-quantitative uptake ratios. Combining visual assessment with uptake ratios did not add to the discriminating power of DaTSCAN(®) SPECT in this material.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, most APS patients showed a Grade 1 (burst striatum) uptake reduction, suggesting more severe dopamine depletion both in putamen and in caudate nucleus in APS. Both Kahraman et al and Davidsson et al have previously published similar results to these findings [7,8]. Compared to the B-SIT test, the visual assessment of DaTSCAN was more efficient in discriminating parkinsonism from Non-parkinsonism in terms of sensitivity (96%), specificity (80%) and diagnostic accuracy (92%).…”
Section: Datscansupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, most APS patients showed a Grade 1 (burst striatum) uptake reduction, suggesting more severe dopamine depletion both in putamen and in caudate nucleus in APS. Both Kahraman et al and Davidsson et al have previously published similar results to these findings [7,8]. Compared to the B-SIT test, the visual assessment of DaTSCAN was more efficient in discriminating parkinsonism from Non-parkinsonism in terms of sensitivity (96%), specificity (80%) and diagnostic accuracy (92%).…”
Section: Datscansupporting
confidence: 59%
“…DaTSCAN imaging has high diagnostic performance in separating patients with PD from patients with non-parkinsonian syndromes [5,6]. However, the efficacy of DaTSCAN imaging in separating PD from APS has been a matter of controversy [4,[7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, whereas this method has proved quite reliable [4,5], its ordinal and relatively crude nature has left some room for intermediate or difficult-to-classify cases, in particular those with questionable uptake deficit early in the disease course. More recently, semi-quantitative methods of assessment have been developed based on the ratio of manually drawn or automatically delineated striatal regions or volumes of interest (ROIs, VOIs) to background activity [6,7] using various protocols and software. While less prone to subjectivity bias or to intra-and inter-observer variability, these analyses require robust reference values, usually established on healthy subjects, to which data from individual patients can be compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results demonstrate that both the update number and the FWHM of the Gaussian filter are considerably important factors in the assessment of the image quality. High contrast is needed for an accurate diagnosis because the shape and intensity of the striatum are important factors for differentiating between the NB and DB groups in visual interpretation [12]. Therefore, the update number and the FWHM of the Gaussian filter must be determined by considering the trade-off of the image contrast and the uniformity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%