2012
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Friction: Experimental Evidence from Medicare Drug Plans

Abstract: Consumers need information to compare alternatives for markets to function efficiently. Recognizing this, public policies often pair competition with easy access to comparative information. The implicit assumption is that comparison friction—the wedge between the availability of comparative information and consumers’ use of it—is inconsequential because information is readily available and consumers will access this information and make effective choices. We examine the extent of comparison friction in the mar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
206
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
206
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may generalize to non-schizophrenic patients, since the general Medicare beneficiary’s voluntarily chosen plan is frequently not optimal. 24, 9, 12, 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding may generalize to non-schizophrenic patients, since the general Medicare beneficiary’s voluntarily chosen plan is frequently not optimal. 24, 9, 12, 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the optimality of a specific option depends on individual attributes of a given consumer, providing personalized information specific to the choice context can improve decision outcomes. For example, Kling et al (2012) find that providing seniors with individualized information on lower-cost Medicare Part D prescription drug plans induces greater switching to a lower-cost plan (an 11–percentage point increase) than providing generic information about the opportunity to switch drug plans (and results in lower expected costs to consumers as well).The presentation of attributes in a way that facilitates informed consumer decision making. Larrick & Soll (2008) show that consumers make more accurate decisions about automobile fuel savings when fuel efficiency is expressed as gallons per 100 miles than with the more traditional miles per gallon measure (the so-called MPG illusion).…”
Section: Behaviorally Informed Policy Tools To Help Agents Executementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the optimality of a specific option depends on individual attributes of a given consumer, providing personalized information specific to the choice context can improve decision outcomes. For example, Kling et al (2012) find that providing seniors with individualized information on lower-cost Medicare Part D prescription drug plans induces greater switching to a lower-cost plan (an 11–percentage point increase) than providing generic information about the opportunity to switch drug plans (and results in lower expected costs to consumers as well).…”
Section: Behaviorally Informed Policy Tools To Help Agents Executementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutler and Zeckhauser 2000; Einav et al 2013; Aron-Dine et al 2015), and the empirical literature on Medicare Part D (e.g. Abaluck and Gruber 2011, 2016; Ketcham and Simon 2008; Ketcham et al 2012, 2015; Kling et al 2012; Abaluck, Gruber, and Swanson 2015; Dalton, Gowrisankaran, and Town 2015; Decarolis 2015; Decarolis, Polyakova, and Ryan 2015; Polyakova 2016). Finally, our estimation of drug-specific elasticities contributes to the empirical literature that has estimated the price responsiveness of demand for specific drugs (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For welfare analysis of choice in privately-provided, publicly-designed health insurance systems, see for example Abaluck and Gruber (2011, 2016), Ketcham et al (2012, 2015), or Kling et al (2012). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%