2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-015-2527-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 13C and 15N discrimination factors and turnover rates between congeneric crayfish Orconectes rusticus and O. virilis (Decapoda, Cambaridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 2.54 is the rusty crayfish discrimination factor or fractionation factor (Δ) representing the absolute difference in δ 15 N between rusty crayfish and its diet, determined in laboratory based on an algae diet (Glon, Larson, & Pangle, 2015). We applied a single fractionation factor to all trophic links of the food web between primary consumers and crayfish and did not account for fractionation differences among crayfish diets due to a lack of more specific reference values.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 2.54 is the rusty crayfish discrimination factor or fractionation factor (Δ) representing the absolute difference in δ 15 N between rusty crayfish and its diet, determined in laboratory based on an algae diet (Glon, Larson, & Pangle, 2015). We applied a single fractionation factor to all trophic links of the food web between primary consumers and crayfish and did not account for fractionation differences among crayfish diets due to a lack of more specific reference values.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors e.g. [63][64][65] have examined crayfish specific 13 C for macroinvertebrates and crayfish, respectively 66 , and 2.4 ± 0.42‰ for δ 15 N and 0.40 ± 0.28‰ for δ 13 C for detritus and periphyton, respectively 67 . www.nature.com/scientificreports/…”
Section: Stomach Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, littoral individuals consumed more resources originating from the littoral habitat than pelagic individuals. Given the turnover rate of stable isotope values in crayfish muscle tissue (>1 month; Carolan, Mazumder, Dimovski, Diocares, & Twining, 2012;Glon, Larson, & Pangle, 2016), these findings indicate that the feeding activity of individuals occurs within their respective habitats. There was, however, no significant difference in trophic position between littoral and pelagic individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%