2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2005.00025.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMPARISON OF A REAL‐TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION ASSAY WITH A CULTURE METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF SALMONELLA IN RETAIL MEAT SAMPLES

Abstract: A real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method developed in this study was compared with a conventional International Organization for Standardization culture method for the detection of Salmonella in Irish beef, chicken, pork and turkey. This also provided a snapshot of the incidence of Salmonella in such products. After selective enrichment, all meat samples (n = 100) were: (1) subjected to DNA extraction and real‐time PCR analysis using primers against Salmonella spp. specific gene (16S rRNA) or the inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among many available methods, real-time PCR is known to be the fastest and most reliable (30,31). Different from previous PCR methods, the protocol used herein has the merit of allowing any increasing fluorescence during gene amplification to be observed in real time through a monitor, obviating the need for subsequent electrophoresis (32), and thus free of any contamination through electrophoresis, reducing the detection time, and enabling rapid quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Isolation and Viable Counts For Yeast And Lab Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many available methods, real-time PCR is known to be the fastest and most reliable (30,31). Different from previous PCR methods, the protocol used herein has the merit of allowing any increasing fluorescence during gene amplification to be observed in real time through a monitor, obviating the need for subsequent electrophoresis (32), and thus free of any contamination through electrophoresis, reducing the detection time, and enabling rapid quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Isolation and Viable Counts For Yeast And Lab Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…over a wide range of food products including beef, sea food, fresh produce, and dairy products (Bohaychuk et al 2007;Cady et al 2005;Calvo et al 2008;Malorny et al 2007;Rodriguez-Lazaro et al 2004). However, barring a few (Bhagwat 2003;Jothikumar et al 2003), most of these assays were explored in uniplex format (Calvo et al 2008;Catarame et al 2006;De Martinis et al 2007;Krascsenicsova et al 2008;Neves et al 2008;Nguyen et al 2004;O'Grady et al 2008;Rodriguez-Lazaro et al 2004). Hence, it would be appropriate to develop multiplex assays for simultaneous detection of more than one pathogen in a food sample by targeting more than one gene specific for each of the target organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…in a wide range of products (Cady et al 2005;Catarame et al 2006;Bohaychuk et al 2007). However, most of these assays except a few (Bhagwat 2003;Jothikumar et al 2003) involved usage of either uniplex format or expensive probe based approaches (Nguyen et al 2004;De Martinis et al 2007;Calvo et al 2008;Krascsenicsova et al 2008;O'Grady et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%