1996
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.210-213.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Absolute Sensitivity Limits of Various Ultrasonic and Vibration Transducers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the sensitivity of the beam deflection technique is proportional to the square root of the laser power, it can be enhanced by employing laser sources with larger output power. However, the unprecedented sensitivity of the PZ transducers cannot be reached by optical techniques based on photodiode detection [30]. We anticipate that further quantitative analysis of the shape of the detected signals could open an interesting new way to probe the evolution of the contact mirror deformation which would in turn reveal the detailed dynamics of the contact area, including the propagation of elastic waves under the mechanical touch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the sensitivity of the beam deflection technique is proportional to the square root of the laser power, it can be enhanced by employing laser sources with larger output power. However, the unprecedented sensitivity of the PZ transducers cannot be reached by optical techniques based on photodiode detection [30]. We anticipate that further quantitative analysis of the shape of the detected signals could open an interesting new way to probe the evolution of the contact mirror deformation which would in turn reveal the detailed dynamics of the contact area, including the propagation of elastic waves under the mechanical touch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of elastic waves may be carried out using surface-deployed sensors that operate through transduction mechanisms based on piezoelectric, electrostatic, electromagnetic or optical (mainly light interferometric) principles [29]. Of these, PZ sensors are the most sensitive [30], making them particularly useful to detect low momentum-transfer impacts. Ball-rod [18], [27] and ball-plate [7], [8], [9], [10], [19], [31], [32], [33] experiments involving the detection of ballimpact-induced elastic waves were realized.…”
Section: Contact Time Measuring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After compensation for absorption, the cross-correlation between the detected signals is compared with another waveform, that which is detected at y after an impulsive excitation at x. Imperfect compensation for the non-flat spectrum produced by the source at s leads to an imperfect correspondence between these two waveforms. tudes of $3 Â 10 À12 , and rms displacement amplitudes of $10 À15 m. Nevertheless, as Fortunko established [11], modern piezoelectrics can be very sensitive and the best devices have noise floors close to the thermal limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal detectable displacement of any displacement-measuring sensor, defined as the value corresponding to a signal-to-noise ratio of unity, is set by the fundamental limit called the thermal rattle or phonon shot noise [32]. However, all optical detection techniques, regardless of whether they are interferometric or non-interferometric, have a much larger minimum detectable displacement, which is given by the photon shot noise [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all optical detection techniques, regardless of whether they are interferometric or non-interferometric, have a much larger minimum detectable displacement, which is given by the photon shot noise [23]. The amplitude of this noise is about two orders of magnitude larger than the phonon noise [32]. The limiting resolution of the detected displacement due to the quantum laser amplitude noise (the photon shot noise) is independent of the frequency; it dominates the detector noise if the interferometric laser output power P L is around 1 mW, and has a value of: 4.5×1017ΔfPnormalLmnormalJwhere Δ f is the measuring frequency bandwidth of the optical sensor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%