1997
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-54-9-2068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of accuracy, precision, and sensitivity in elemental assays of fish otoliths using the electron microprobe, proton-induced X-ray emission, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CaCO 3 accounts for 96.2% of otolith weight and normalization of element contents in otoliths to Ca can effectively reduce inter-sample variance [21] . So, the contents of ferromagnetic elements (Fe, Co, Ni) and other metal elements in the lagenal, saccular and utricular otolith samples of adult homing pigeons were normalized to the content of Ca in the corresponding samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CaCO 3 accounts for 96.2% of otolith weight and normalization of element contents in otoliths to Ca can effectively reduce inter-sample variance [21] . So, the contents of ferromagnetic elements (Fe, Co, Ni) and other metal elements in the lagenal, saccular and utricular otolith samples of adult homing pigeons were normalized to the content of Ca in the corresponding samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lab standard, consisting of Micropogonias undulatus otoliths ground to micron-sized particles (Campana et al 1997), was also assayed periodically throughout the otolith analysis to assess measurement repeatability. All elemental data were subsequently converted to molar concentrations and expressed as ratios to Ca.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a wide variety of sophisticated instruments available for probed assays of the otolith (Coutant 1990, Jackson et al 1993, Gauldie et al 1994, Jambers et al 1995, but the most frequently used include the energy-dispersive (ED-EM) and wavelength-dispersive (WD-EM) electron microprobes (Gunn et al 1992), proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) (Sie & Thresher 1992), and laser ablation ICPMS (LA-ICPMS) (Campana et al 1994). In a detailed experimental comparison among the above instruments, Campana et al (1997) noted that no one instrument type was sensitive to each element, nor was any one instrument preferred for use in all assays. In general, however, the minor elements such as Na and K could only be measured accurately with an electron microprobe, while the trace elements required PIXE or LA-ICPMS.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%