2019
DOI: 10.3390/polym11030397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment

Abstract: The cost of most primary materials is increasing, therefore, finding innovative solutions for the re-use of residual waste has become a topic discussed more intensely in recent years. WPCs certainly meet some of these demands. The presented study is focused on an experimental analysis of the effect of surface treatment on the adhesive properties of selected WPCs. Bonding of polymer-based materials is a rather complicated phenomenon and modification of the bonded area in order to improve the adhesive properties… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained improvements were higher than those from [21], where a 67.6% increase in coating adhesion after plasma treatment was reported, as were improvements better than those found from pull-off tests in thermoplastic polyurethane/beech and spruce veneers-1.0 and 2.5 MPa, respectively [44]. A similar apparent enhancement in bondline performance was reported by Novák and co-workers for plasma-treated polyester films in peel tests (270-325%) [28], as well as by Nečasová and co-workers, who observed significant increases in the cohesive failure mode rate for plasma-treated substrates [45]. The above results confirmed the hypothesis that discharge air plasma treatment could be an efficient tool for increasing the SFE of PLA films by changing the chemistry of their surface and subsequently improving adhesion interactions with polar substrates.…”
Section: Effect Of Plasma Treatment On the Performance Of Adhesive Jointssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The obtained improvements were higher than those from [21], where a 67.6% increase in coating adhesion after plasma treatment was reported, as were improvements better than those found from pull-off tests in thermoplastic polyurethane/beech and spruce veneers-1.0 and 2.5 MPa, respectively [44]. A similar apparent enhancement in bondline performance was reported by Novák and co-workers for plasma-treated polyester films in peel tests (270-325%) [28], as well as by Nečasová and co-workers, who observed significant increases in the cohesive failure mode rate for plasma-treated substrates [45]. The above results confirmed the hypothesis that discharge air plasma treatment could be an efficient tool for increasing the SFE of PLA films by changing the chemistry of their surface and subsequently improving adhesion interactions with polar substrates.…”
Section: Effect Of Plasma Treatment On the Performance Of Adhesive Jointssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Different mechanical, chemical and physical surface treatment methods can be applied since the created interaction forces depend on the substrates surface morphology and surface chemistry (Nečasová et al 2019;Sauerbier et al 2018). Plasma treatment (PT) is a fast and versatile physical method for surface modification, which is environmentally friendly because of the absence of organic solvents (Lecoq et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyurethane adhesive (PU)—GSP PU 902H and GSP PU 902—supplied by GSP Products, Thailand, was selected for this study, in order to fulfill the ranges for the engineering applications of wood joints [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. A mixture of this commercial PU adhesive with a ratio of GSP PU 902H to GSP PU 902 of 1:3 was prepared at ambient temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%