Comparison of Advance Medical Directive Inquiry and Documentation for Hospital Inpatients in Three Medical Services: Implications for Policy Changes

Abstract

Following the introduction of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990, the Veterans Health Administration developed its own advance medical directive (AMD) policy, which most recently states that documentation is mandatory for all hospital patients in all settings. The object of this study was to assess the effectiveness of AMD documentation at a local Veterans Affairs Medical Center. AMD documentation was compared among three inpatient services: surgery, medicine, and psychiatry. Retrospective in nature, 594 inpatient cases were compared. Results revealed that, overall, the rate of AMD documentation was 37.7%. AMD documentation on surgery was statistically more frequent (45.6%) than for either medicine (33.2%) or psychiatry (34.5%). The difference between the numbers of days to AMD documentation for all three services was not statistically significant. While there was no statistically significant difference across gender, Caucasians had AMDs documented more frequently than African Americans (p < .001). Logistic regression reveals that social worker and physician intervention, not patient-specific variables, are the primary predictors of AMD incidence. Policy makers may need to consider the realities of hospital care, especially in emergency settings, and be more specific in the steps of implementation of the policy in the evenings, weekends, and holidays. True adherence to policy implementation may require hospital administrators to increase staff and educational efforts so that the concept of AMD communication and documentation is completely explained to all staff and patients. Policy should include an electronic record reminder that is renewed every 3 years and provisions for accommodating patients who arrive on weekends and holidays, with special awareness of the particular communication needs of minority groups. The study conclusions are that further inquiry is needed to understand these policy nuances to enable the Veterans Affairs Administration to improve its policies and performance in this important aspect of healthcare.

Early resuscitation orders in hospitalized oldest-old with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study

“…This is transcending the prevalence of hospital resuscitation orders taken in non-COVID times with prevalence ranging from 20% to 40%. [22][23][24] A possible explanation may be that COVID patients are expected to have a higher need for ICU referral, a longer duration of mechanical ventilation followed by much longer and as consequence less successful rehabilitation process, compared to non-COVID patients. These facts reflect more urge to discuss treatment limitation in patients with COVID.…”

Managing a Suicidal or Gravely Disabled Patient on an Involuntary Psychiatric Hold and Who Has End-ofLife Orders: Key Factors to Consider in an Emergency Room Setting

“…Race/ethnicity may be another factor in end-of-life decisions. In a study of Advance Medical Directive (AMD) documentation, Caucasians had AMDs significantly documented more frequently than African Americans [24]. In a study of patients in an urban teaching hospital, non-white patients were more likely than white patients to have DNR orders, and patients who spoke fluent English were more likely to be involved in a DNR decision than those who did not [25].…”