2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of affect-regulated, self-regulated, and heart-rate regulated exercise prescriptions: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While traditional PA prescriptions instruct participants to regulate PA based on certain thresholds for intensity (e.g., % of VO 2 max or % heart rate reserve; Garber et al, 2011), selfselected intensity PA prescriptions allow participants to choose their own intensity, whereas affect-regulated prescriptions explicitly instruct participants to choose an intensity that feels good (Zenko et al, 2017). Both self-selected intensity and affect-regulated prescriptions appear to yield more positive affective responses to PA (Parfitt et al, 2006;Lind et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2016) and greater PA engagement over time compared to traditional intensity-based PA prescriptions (Williams et al, 2015(Williams et al, , 2016Baldwin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While traditional PA prescriptions instruct participants to regulate PA based on certain thresholds for intensity (e.g., % of VO 2 max or % heart rate reserve; Garber et al, 2011), selfselected intensity PA prescriptions allow participants to choose their own intensity, whereas affect-regulated prescriptions explicitly instruct participants to choose an intensity that feels good (Zenko et al, 2017). Both self-selected intensity and affect-regulated prescriptions appear to yield more positive affective responses to PA (Parfitt et al, 2006;Lind et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2016) and greater PA engagement over time compared to traditional intensity-based PA prescriptions (Williams et al, 2015(Williams et al, , 2016Baldwin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%