2011
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v3n3p101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of AFLP and SSR for Genetic Diversity Analysis of Brassica napus Hybrids

Abstract: The AFLP and SSR markers were used to estimate the genetic diversity of 25 Brassica napus hybrids attending Guizhou regional test. The fingerprints obtained with both the AFLP and SSR markers revealed high levels of heterozygosity. Nine AFLP primer combinations produced 16 loci, while 11 SSR primer pairs generated 22 loci. The mean of expected heterozygosity, Shannon's information index, and genetic differentiation obtained by SSR were higher than those by AFLP, indicating that the SSR methodology evaluated ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
5
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower polymorphism of dominant markers in comparison with codominant markers was confirmed before in other studies (Garcia et al, 2004; van Treuren & van Hintum, 2009; Li et al, 2011; Hamza et al, 2013). Lower variation of ISJ markers can also result from their conserved sequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Lower polymorphism of dominant markers in comparison with codominant markers was confirmed before in other studies (Garcia et al, 2004; van Treuren & van Hintum, 2009; Li et al, 2011; Hamza et al, 2013). Lower variation of ISJ markers can also result from their conserved sequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These findings are consistent with other studies comparing the level of polymorphism detected with SSR and AFLP markers [11, 16], and can be explained by the fact that SSR markers detect multiple alleles at a given locus, usually pre-selected for its high variability, whereas AFLP assays mainly detect single alleles at multiple loci randomly distributed in the genome.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In oilseed rape, unlike several other important crops, we cannot use sources of genetic variation from natural populations (Prakash & Hinata 1980) and therefore techniques and approaches recognizing the extent of genetic variability are very beneficial. Molecular markers used in this study have also been used as effective tools to provide molecular data and evaluate genetic relationships in other studies although they did not include such diverse genetic resources (Sobotka et al 2004;Li et al 2011;Abdelmigid 2012). The importance and benefit of this study lies in the direct comparison of all accessions tested by three molecular techniques and their genetic diversity evaluation for the purposes of combinational crossing of distant genotypes in line and hybrid breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%