2017
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-20465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Alternative Tumor Size Classifications for Posterior Uveal Melanomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may explain why the prognostic accuracy of LBD alone was similar to the entire clinical TNM staging system in this study and others. 10 Third, the assessment of “T” variables, such as measuring tumor dimensions and determining ciliary body involvement, is not standardized and may vary from center to center. 27,28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may explain why the prognostic accuracy of LBD alone was similar to the entire clinical TNM staging system in this study and others. 10 Third, the assessment of “T” variables, such as measuring tumor dimensions and determining ciliary body involvement, is not standardized and may vary from center to center. 27,28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the inherent complexity of the TNM methodology limits its precision, reproducibility, and ease of use in the clinical setting. 10,11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advances in UM therapies, almost half of the patients are ultimately at risk for developing metastatic disease, primarily due to the inability to identify a unique feature of UM which is early micro-metastases [13]. Owing to this frequent subsequent presentation, patients diagnosed with UM require periodic surveillance with physical examination, blood tests and radiographic imaging such as CT, MRI, abdominal ultrasound or PET/CT.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical features incorporated into the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for UM are cumbersome to analyze and include the tumor size, presence or absence of ciliary body involvement and/or extraocular extension, thickness and diameter, lymph node involvement, and presence or absence of metastasis . Ocular oncologists favoring simpler tools for risk assessment in posterior UM consider the 3‐category linear measurement of the tumor's largest basal diameter to be a promising alternative to the unwieldy TNM system . Data generated from applying TNM classification show that the patients at the highest risk for recurrence are those with stage IIIA‐C disease.…”
Section: Challenges In Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%