2000
DOI: 10.1177/112067210001000111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Analgesia and Akinesia after Retrobulbar Injections at Different Speeds

Abstract: This comparison of different injection velocities brought to light no significant differences regarding bulbar analgesia and akinesia after RBA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to injection speed, injecting 5 ml of anesthetic agent within 60 seconds is generally considered a slow speed for a retrobulbar injection. 28,29 On this basis, we suggest that a safe speed for retrobulbar filler injections is 1 ml every 15 seconds. Also, based on previous reports, the appropriate volume range of retrobulbar filler injections for orbital volume enhancement could be considered to be between 1.0 and 2.5 ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With regard to injection speed, injecting 5 ml of anesthetic agent within 60 seconds is generally considered a slow speed for a retrobulbar injection. 28,29 On this basis, we suggest that a safe speed for retrobulbar filler injections is 1 ml every 15 seconds. Also, based on previous reports, the appropriate volume range of retrobulbar filler injections for orbital volume enhancement could be considered to be between 1.0 and 2.5 ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The use of a microprocessor controlled delivery system to administer a constant slow rate of local anesthetic has been reported to cause less discomfort than the manual syringe technique 39. However, the speed of anesthetic delivery during retrobulbar and parabulbar injection did not significantly affect pain scores in one study 36…”
Section: Preparation and Administration Of Local Anestheticmentioning
confidence: 95%