2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-014-0645-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ankle angle adaptations of prosthetic feet with and without adaptive ankle angle during level ground, ramp, and stair ambulations of a transtibial amputee: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ESRFs, bending of both keel and the ankle joint was caused by the participant's weight during the stance phase, whereas in PFAAs there was only keel bending. In the swing phase, a greater ROM during dorsiflexion was shown for PFAAs, indicating that PFAAs can adjust their ankles to enhance foot clearance [6,7,13]. During the stance phase, the highest flexion in the knee and hip were shown in ESRFs, and less flexion in the knee and hip was shown in the élan and echelon compared to that in the Proprio-foot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ESRFs, bending of both keel and the ankle joint was caused by the participant's weight during the stance phase, whereas in PFAAs there was only keel bending. In the swing phase, a greater ROM during dorsiflexion was shown for PFAAs, indicating that PFAAs can adjust their ankles to enhance foot clearance [6,7,13]. During the stance phase, the highest flexion in the knee and hip were shown in ESRFs, and less flexion in the knee and hip was shown in the élan and echelon compared to that in the Proprio-foot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although we performed comparisons among such PFAAs, only ankle joint adaptation was evaluated on level ground, a ramp, and stairs [13]. To further understanding of the complex biomechanical interactions in each foot during level walking, kinematic and kinetic studies on joint coordination in the ankle, knee, and hip are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ko et al [20] presented qualitative results only for the prosthethic side of one person with amputation walking on ramps with different prosthesis. Their results on the prosthetic side showed a relationship between stance and swing phase of approximately 60 to 40% [20], which is similar to the results obtained in this study.…”
Section: Spatio Temporal Parameters (Stp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author suggested that this could be one of the possible reasons for the increase in reported levels of satisfaction. Ko et al [20] evaluated ankle angle and external work symmetry on different terrains (level ground, 7° slope, 15 cm high stairs) and found an overall increase in symmetry in PFAA and PFAA-MC. The authors then discussed that this improvement in symmetry when using adaptive ankle feet may influence spatiotemporal parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In static conditions, Ernst et al investigated a cohort of people with an amputation using five different feet while standing on flat and inclined surfaces (Meridium™, Propriofoot™, Elan™, Triton,™ and Raize™) and showed that the increased range of motion and the dorsiflexion stop allow an adaptation closer to the one of asymptomatic subjects. 10 In dynamic conditions, Ko et al 11 compared two different MPAs (Elan™ and Propriofoot™) with an ESR foot on one transtibial patient. They observed an increase of the stance phase duration during ambulation combined with a greater dorsiflexion while using the MPAs on slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%