2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-020-0403-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ankle–brachial index measured with an automatic oscillometric method with the standard continuous Doppler method and effect of rest time before the measure in patients with exertional limb symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some noted that even though the Doppler and oscillometric methods were not fully interchangeable, the oscillometric devices could be used in outpatient screening [ 23 , 24 ]. In the studies that did not endorse the oscillometric ABI use, the results showed poor agreement with the Doppler technique [ 25 , 26 ], substantial variation of the results [ 26 ], and insufficient accuracy, especially in subjects with low ankle pressures [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some noted that even though the Doppler and oscillometric methods were not fully interchangeable, the oscillometric devices could be used in outpatient screening [ 23 , 24 ]. In the studies that did not endorse the oscillometric ABI use, the results showed poor agreement with the Doppler technique [ 25 , 26 ], substantial variation of the results [ 26 ], and insufficient accuracy, especially in subjects with low ankle pressures [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%