2014
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980014000597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of anthropometric-based equations for estimation of body fat percentage in a normal-weight and overweight female cohort: validation via air-displacement plethysmography

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the most commonly used anthropometricbased equations in the estimation of percentage body fat (%BF) in both normalweight and overweight women using air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the criterion measure. Design: A comparative study in which the equations of Durnin and Womersley (1974; DW) and Jackson, Pollock and Ward (1980) at three, four and seven sites (JPW 3 , JPW 4 and JPW 7 ) were validated against ADP in three groups. Group 1 included all participants, gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To increase the robustness of the outcomes of our systematic review, we excluded articles where body composition was estimated by skinfold measurements and equations. The accuracy of skinfold measurements depends on the number of measurement sites and the formula used to calculate the percentage of body fat [ 33 ]. Since there are many different techniques [ 79 ], it is impossible to compare results accurately between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To increase the robustness of the outcomes of our systematic review, we excluded articles where body composition was estimated by skinfold measurements and equations. The accuracy of skinfold measurements depends on the number of measurement sites and the formula used to calculate the percentage of body fat [ 33 ]. Since there are many different techniques [ 79 ], it is impossible to compare results accurately between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent methodology review performed by Nana et al, only few of the studies, where body composition of athletes was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), provided details about their subject and device standardization [ 30 ]. However, other methods like skinfold measurements require highly experienced investigators [ 32 ] and strongly depend on the number of measurement sites and the formula used to calculate the percentage of body fat [ 33 ]. Therefore, it is important to report standardization protocols in order to evaluate the quality of data assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, periodic assessments of percentage body fat (BF%) may provide valuable information to monitor public health that is quick, low cost, non-invasive and accurate. Many assessment methods can be used to determine BF%, such as the underwater weighing method [ 3 ], air-displacement plethysmography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) [ 4 , 5 ]. However, the application of these methods is limited by their cost and complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body fat percentage was taken according to the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) standards using a Harpenden skinfold caliper (Baty International, United Kingdom). Body fat percentage was calculated using the equation of Jackson, Pollock, and Ward (26,28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%