2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints with EUCAST and CLSI clinical breakpoints for Gram-positive bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was assumed and the following equation was used, valid for i.v. infusions [16]:…”
Section: Estimation Of Ft >Mic and Probability Of Target Attainment (mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was assumed and the following equation was used, valid for i.v. infusions [16]:…”
Section: Estimation Of Ft >Mic and Probability Of Target Attainment (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the accepted level of PTA being 90%, it is not yet well defined and different values (99%, 95% or 90%) have been used [16]. If 90% is used, this means that 10% of the population infected with a micro-organism that has the MIC used to determine the PK/PD index would probably not be covered [16].…”
Section: Organismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations