Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Highlights. The most important goal of atrial fibrillation surgical treatment is to eliminate the arrhythmia in order to restore atrial contractility and improve their transport function. Our study showed positive dynamics of atrial contractility and remodeling after the maze-3 procedure against the background of a regular heart rhythm restoration. The study of sinus rhythm predictors maintenance and recovery of atrial transport function will help to make patient selection more personified.Aim. Evaluation of atrial contractility and remodeling after the maze-3 procedure with combined interventions on the heart.Methods. The analysis of 217 combined surgical interventions was carried out, where a maze-3 was used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). The operations were performed in our center from 2012 to 2016. Key points of the study: rhythm after surgery and echocardiographic control in the long-term follow-up in order to determine the dynamics of atrial contractility and volumes. The average follow-up period was 47 (1–100) months. 40 (18.4%) patients had paroxysmal, 38 (17.5%) persistent, 139 (64.1%) long-term persistent AF. The mean AF duration before surgery was 27.4 months (1–200 months). The indications for the maze-3 procedure were: ineffectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapy, the need to perform combined cardiac procedures. We used standard statistical research methods with one – and multivariate logistic regression.Results. In the long-term follow-up, sinus rhythm (SR) persists in 79% of patients. In the long-term follow-up, in this group of patients, the left atrial contractility was restored from 76% to 91%, while the biatrial contractility increased from 82 to 96%. Shorter AF duration before surgery was a positive predictor of SR recovery and atrial contractility (p = 0.005), while pulmonary artery pressure and patient age negatively affected these indicators (p = 0.041 and p = 0.038, respectively). The presence of SR early after surgery was not a significant predictor of AF freedom. At the same time, according to the long-term observations, patients maintaining a regular atrial heart rate had positive indicators of atrial systolic function restoration and a positive dynamics of a decrease in atrial volumes.Conclusion. SR and restoration of left atrial contractility are two interrelated goals of the maze procedure. The negative factors associated with the failure of surgical treatment of AF are increased pressure in the pulmonary artery, long-term AF before surgery, and the age of patients.
Highlights. The most important goal of atrial fibrillation surgical treatment is to eliminate the arrhythmia in order to restore atrial contractility and improve their transport function. Our study showed positive dynamics of atrial contractility and remodeling after the maze-3 procedure against the background of a regular heart rhythm restoration. The study of sinus rhythm predictors maintenance and recovery of atrial transport function will help to make patient selection more personified.Aim. Evaluation of atrial contractility and remodeling after the maze-3 procedure with combined interventions on the heart.Methods. The analysis of 217 combined surgical interventions was carried out, where a maze-3 was used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). The operations were performed in our center from 2012 to 2016. Key points of the study: rhythm after surgery and echocardiographic control in the long-term follow-up in order to determine the dynamics of atrial contractility and volumes. The average follow-up period was 47 (1–100) months. 40 (18.4%) patients had paroxysmal, 38 (17.5%) persistent, 139 (64.1%) long-term persistent AF. The mean AF duration before surgery was 27.4 months (1–200 months). The indications for the maze-3 procedure were: ineffectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapy, the need to perform combined cardiac procedures. We used standard statistical research methods with one – and multivariate logistic regression.Results. In the long-term follow-up, sinus rhythm (SR) persists in 79% of patients. In the long-term follow-up, in this group of patients, the left atrial contractility was restored from 76% to 91%, while the biatrial contractility increased from 82 to 96%. Shorter AF duration before surgery was a positive predictor of SR recovery and atrial contractility (p = 0.005), while pulmonary artery pressure and patient age negatively affected these indicators (p = 0.041 and p = 0.038, respectively). The presence of SR early after surgery was not a significant predictor of AF freedom. At the same time, according to the long-term observations, patients maintaining a regular atrial heart rate had positive indicators of atrial systolic function restoration and a positive dynamics of a decrease in atrial volumes.Conclusion. SR and restoration of left atrial contractility are two interrelated goals of the maze procedure. The negative factors associated with the failure of surgical treatment of AF are increased pressure in the pulmonary artery, long-term AF before surgery, and the age of patients.
AIM: To study EFI parameters and features of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients who underwent surgical correction of AF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: from January 2013 to December 2021, 447 combined interventions were performed to eliminate AF using the labyrinth-3 and left atrial labyrinth techniques with correction of CHD (congenital heart disease) and/or coronary artery disease. Rhythm disturbances were detected in 57 (12.7%) patients at various follow-up periods. Endovascular interventions were performed in 39 patients. The average follow-up period after the endocardial stage was 34.37 (standard deviation 24.32) months. The median age of patients was 64 (58–67) years, 21 (54%) were men. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — after the classic biatrial (BA) labyrinth-3 — 23 (59%) patients, group 2 — after the left-atrial variant (LA) labyrinth-3 — 16 (41%) patients. At the endocardial stage, electrophysiological studies (EFI) were performed to clarify the mechanism of arrhythmia, and ablation eliminated tachyarrhythmia. EFI protocol: revision of the pulmonary veins, determination of the isolation of the posterior wall of the LA assessment of atrial arrhythmia, elimination of arrhythmia, control induction of arrhythmia after ablation. After repeated intervention, patients were observed in the operating clinic every 3 months. RESULTS: After the endocardial stage, a regular rhythm was determined in 19 (82.6%) patients of the BA group, 13 (92.9%) patients of the LA group (p = 0.914). Relapses in the form of AF were noted in 5 patients (4 — group 1 and 1 — group 2) group (p = 0.306) All relapses of tachyarrhythmia with an irregular cycle (AF) were detected in patients with AF before the endovascular stage In both groups, there were cases of restoration of conduction in the pulmonary veins — 10 (43.5%) patients after BA ablation and 1 (5.3%) patient after LA ablation. There are no recurrences of atrial arrhythmia after ablation of atrial flutter (arrhythmia with a stable cycle). CONCLUSION: The endocardial stage is highly effective and demonstrates subsequent freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients who have tachycardia with a regular cycle after both methods of surgical ablation of AF. Recurrent tachyarrhythmia in the form of AF (irregular cycle) is associated with a low probability of maintaining a regular atrial rhythm after a repeated endocardial procedure, due to the presence of structural and electrophysiological changes in the atrial myocardium.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.