2014
DOI: 10.1159/000362109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Abstract: Background: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising technique to evaluate dry weight. We compared the dry weight calculated by the three BIA equations Carlo Basile (CB) , Yanna Dou (YD) and the body composition spectroscopy (BCS) with clinical evaluation in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods: The dry weight of enrolled MHD patients (DWClin) was evaluated under strict clinical surveillance. The whole-body resistances at 50 kHz, intra- and extracellular resistances were mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We categorized patients both in terms of absolute ECW excess, using ECW volume cut offs of less than, and more than 2.0 L of the normal ECW predicted from the ICW measured by, and also by the overhydration index (OH index) proposed by Chamney et al using their OH index cut offs of less than and more than 15% (15,22). In addition we calculated ECW excess using the equation developed by Abbas et al (13), and also the ratio of ECW/height cut offs using two standard deviations based on normative data to categorize underhydration and overhydration (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We categorized patients both in terms of absolute ECW excess, using ECW volume cut offs of less than, and more than 2.0 L of the normal ECW predicted from the ICW measured by, and also by the overhydration index (OH index) proposed by Chamney et al using their OH index cut offs of less than and more than 15% (15,22). In addition we calculated ECW excess using the equation developed by Abbas et al (13), and also the ratio of ECW/height cut offs using two standard deviations based on normative data to categorize underhydration and overhydration (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To aid clinical decision making, a number of approaches using cardiac natriuretic peptides and bioimpedance have been proposed to estimate ECW excess in dialysis patients , including comparing ECW with normally hydrated tissue water content , and ratios of ECW to TBW , and ECW to height .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%