2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of caesarean section and vaginal delivery for pelvic floor function of parturients: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 5 ] However, even without reducing access to medically indicated CS, decreasing the overall rate of CS may lead to increased morbidity and associated cost increases for at least some types of health problems, such as pelvic floor function problems. [ 24 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 5 ] However, even without reducing access to medically indicated CS, decreasing the overall rate of CS may lead to increased morbidity and associated cost increases for at least some types of health problems, such as pelvic floor function problems. [ 24 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] However, even without reducing access to medically indicated CS, decreasing the overall rate of CS may lead to increased morbidity and associated cost increases for at least some types of health problems, such as pelvic floor function problems. [24] Incremental cost estimates require data on the total population of women in each region, as well as the expected number and order of children that will be born to women within that cohort. We used census data on the total number of women aged 18 years in Ireland and England/Wales in 2016, and adjusted for the background mortality rate and rate of multiple pregnancies to avoid overestimating the number of hospital birth episodes.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, studies have been published indicating that normal vaginal delivery does not weaken the pelvic floor if evaluated independently of parity (13,14). However, in a recently published meta-analysis, in which 9 studies and 4491 patients were involved, cesarean section was proposed to protect the pelvic floor, and statistically, significant improvement was observed in the cesarean group in all components of pelvic floor disorders (15). In the current study, it was observed that the type of delivery did not weaken the pelvic floor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em uma revisão sistemática com metanálise, Yang e Sun 26 descreveram que o parto cesáreo é o modo de parto preferido para as gestantes em termos de função do assoalho pélvico. Porém, a indicação de parto cesáreo deve levar em consideração outros riscos para a saúde da mãe e do feto como complicações cirúrgicas, cardiovasculares e infecções etc.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Porém, a indicação de parto cesáreo deve levar em consideração outros riscos para a saúde da mãe e do feto como complicações cirúrgicas, cardiovasculares e infecções etc. [25][26][27] Por isso, a cesariana deve ser discutida com a paciente apenas se houver um risco aumentado de perda funcional do trabalho de parto, e não apenas para os propósitos de evitar danos no assoalho pélvico e possível comprometimento da IU pós-parto. 27 No entanto, mulheres que não exercitam o assoalho pélvico, durante a gravidez, estão mais propensas a desenvolver algum tipo de DAP, principalmente a IU.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified