2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04118-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of calcium and hydroxyl ion release ability and in vivo apatite-forming ability of three bioceramic-containing root canal sealers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported that in vitro experiments using arti cial body uids do not accurately predict the ability of HCSCs to produce hydroxyapatite in vivo [16,17,19]. Some discrepancies were also found between the previous in vitro results and the current in vivo results regarding the hydroxyapatite formation on second-generation HCSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have reported that in vitro experiments using arti cial body uids do not accurately predict the ability of HCSCs to produce hydroxyapatite in vivo [16,17,19]. Some discrepancies were also found between the previous in vitro results and the current in vivo results regarding the hydroxyapatite formation on second-generation HCSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…No traces of hydroxyapatite formation were found on the ECZr, MTAHP, EMTA, WST, WPT, BioCR, and MTAF implants through the micro-Raman spectrometry and the surface ultrastructural and elemental characterization. These HCSCs were further assessed regarding their hydroxyapatite-forming ability in rat subcutaneous tissue using elemental mapping, as performed in our previous studies [5,17].…”
Section: Elemental Mapping Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of setting reactions apparently depends on many factors, of which the material composition, as well as the particle morphology and packing characteristics, remains uncontrollable and may be associated with differences in chemical kinetics [ 26 , 27 ]. In general, HCSCs with higher rates of setting reactions are expected to have a faster formation of CSH and thus result in the reduced solubility and washout potential, along with a more tightly packed material matrix transmitting less X-ray photons to the detector plate [ 15 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the chemical characterization of the specimens has not been performed in the present study, the clearly visible precipitates, particularly in the BIOC, TFHF, and BR materials, might be suggested as being different types of calcium phosphate, which typically forms on the HCSC surface as a result of calcium and phosphate ion absorption to the Si-OH group and may have a varying structure from stable crystalline, as noticed in TFHF, to nearly amorphous, as displayed by AHPB [ 25 , 30 ]. The process commonly occurs within the first few days of material application [ 26 ], explaining the limited precipitation noticed for all the tested materials after the initial 24 h, and is highly influenced by the quantitative extension of calcium hydroxide-induced alkalinity and Ca 2+ release [ 27 , 31 ]. In fact, the superior precipitation properties could be accredited to the HCSCs that produce a higher amount of calcium hydroxide during the initial hydration reaction or have a supplemental calcium hydroxide added to the composition as seen in TF and TFHF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the apparent apatite formation on P-NBG and the limited apatite formation on F-NBG in 10-g/L BSA-SBF, possibly only P-NBG produces sufficient apatite in clinical settings to prevent bacterial leakage [7] and support tissue healing [9]. A recent study also suggested that the AFA of F-NBG may be clinically insufficient, showing no apatite precipitation on F-NBG in rat subcutaneous tissue [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%