2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of capillary electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing for analysis of casein/caseinate addition in processed cheeses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While both methods showed comparable recovery of isoelectric casein, CIEF provided a significantly better recovery of sodium caseinate than CZE. On the other hand, CZE achieved higher precision of the analysis [127].…”
Section: Dairy Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While both methods showed comparable recovery of isoelectric casein, CIEF provided a significantly better recovery of sodium caseinate than CZE. On the other hand, CZE achieved higher precision of the analysis [127].…”
Section: Dairy Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Casein is important for the food industry due to its functional properties, and it provides a suitable food structure and consistency, mostly by the ability to emulsify fat and bind water. As casein is released from the gut more slowly due its compact composition, it demonstrates very high leucine deposition, which can last up to 7 h (Dangin et al , ; Miralles et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods are used to analyse the protein fractions, namely, electrophoretic techniques (Carretero et al 1994; Park & Jin, 1998), isoelectric focusing (IEF) (Miralles et al 2006; Criscione et al 2009; Giambra et al 2010) and capillary electrophoresis (De Block et al 2003; Clément et al 2006; Criscione et al 2009). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) by ion-exchange (Andrews et al 1985), hydrophobic interactions (Goheen & Gibbins, 2000; Ferreira et al 2001), gel filtration (Grupta, 1983), reversed phase (Ferreira & Caçote, 2003; Polidori et al 2009) and immunological methods (Haza et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%