2014
DOI: 10.5617/jeb.690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cardiac time intervals between echocardiography and impedance cardiography at various heart rates

Abstract: The non-invasively measured initial systolic time interval (ISTI) reflects a time difference between the electrical and pumping activity of the heart and depends on cardiac preload, afterload, autonomic nervous control and training level. However, the duration of the ISTI has not yet been compared to other time markers of the heart cycle. The present study gauges the duration of the ISTI by comparing the end point of this interval, the C-point, with heart cycle markers obtained by echocardiography. The heart r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP)—the time (in ms) between the ECG Q point (the onset of ventricular depolarization; Berntson et al, 2004) and the dZ/dt B point (the opening of the aortic valve and start of left ventricular ejection; Lozano et al, 2007)—is widely used in effort research (Richter, 2012). As a secondary sympathetic outcome, we also computed the RZ interval: the time (in ms) between the ECG R point (the point of peak electrical activity) and the dZ/dt Z point (the dZ/dt peak and point of maximal diameter of the aortic arch; van Eijnatten, van Rijssel, Peters, Verdaasdonk, & Meijer, 2014). Also known as the initial systolic time interval (ISTI; Meijer, Boesveldt, Elbertse, & Berendse, 2008), RZ is increasingly popular as a measure of contractility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP)—the time (in ms) between the ECG Q point (the onset of ventricular depolarization; Berntson et al, 2004) and the dZ/dt B point (the opening of the aortic valve and start of left ventricular ejection; Lozano et al, 2007)—is widely used in effort research (Richter, 2012). As a secondary sympathetic outcome, we also computed the RZ interval: the time (in ms) between the ECG R point (the point of peak electrical activity) and the dZ/dt Z point (the dZ/dt peak and point of maximal diameter of the aortic arch; van Eijnatten, van Rijssel, Peters, Verdaasdonk, & Meijer, 2014). Also known as the initial systolic time interval (ISTI; Meijer, Boesveldt, Elbertse, & Berendse, 2008), RZ is increasingly popular as a measure of contractility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute shortening of ISTI for the patient with hypertension can be attributed to compensatory reaction and increased myocardial contractility. Also we have observed the shortening of the ISTI with increasing heart rate in response to an exercise stimulus in the same spirit as in [10]. It is interesting that ISTI has different slopes for healthy subjects (IST I ∝ 0.14RR) and the patient with hypertension (IST I ∝ 0.1RR).…”
Section: R Stepanov Et Al / Assessment Of Cardiac Time Intervals Bymentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The objective of this work is a demonstration of the wavelet transform for processing and interpretation of the impedance cardiogram waveforms and an investigation the possibilities of this approach to determine the parameters of the SV, in particular LVET. Also we measured initial systolic time interval (ISTI) -delay between electrical and mechanical pumping activities of the heart [10]. We note that ISTI is not particularly different from the electro-mechanical delay.…”
Section: S805mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEP is the time (in ms) between the ECG Q point (Berntson et al, 2004) and the dZ/dt B point (Lozano et al, 2007). The RZ interval is the time (in ms) between the ECG R point and the dZ/dt Z point (Meijer et al, 2008; van Eijnatten et al, 2014). The points were based on ensemble averages (Kelsey et al, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%