Comparison of cephalometric measurements from three radiological clinics

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The orthodontic documentation carried out in radiological clinics is essential for diagnosis, planning and control of the orthodontic treatment. Amongst the diagnosis elements used are the cephalometric measurements, and errors can be incorporated as they are obtained. The objective of this work was to evaluate the values of some cephalometric measurements obtained in three radiological clinics using 30 lateral cephalometric radiographs of the head randomly chosen from the archives of the Department of Child Dentistry (Discipline of Orthodontics), School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, UNICAMP. These values were compared with the measurements obtained manually (control group) using variance analysis and Tukey's and Friedman's tests. Of the fourteen cephalometric measurements evaluated, the results demonstrated that only four of them presented statistically significant differences: IMPA, 1-NA, FMA, and H-nose. We concluded that although the majority of the mean cephalometric values did not present statistically significant differences, a great variability in the results was found when all the radiographic values were compared. This variability may influence the interpretation of the cephalometric measurements. Hence, we suggest that when the practitioner receives orthodontic documentation, he/she should redo the cephalometric analysis and compare the measurement values found with those presented to him. In addition, the practitioner should be prepared to use other elements for diagnosis, planning and control of the orthodontic treatment. DESCRIPTORS: Cephalometry; Observation variations; Diagnostic errors. RESUMO:A documentação ortodôntica realizada em clínicas radiológicas é essencial para diagnóstico, planejamento e controle do tratamento ortodôntico. Dentre os elementos de diagnóstico utilizados estão as grandezas cefalométricas, e erros podem ser incorporados durante a obtenção das mesmas. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar os valores de algumas grandezas cefalométricas obtidas em três clínicas radiológicas, utilizando-se 30 telerradiografias da cabeça em norma lateral, escolhidas ao acaso, do arquivo do Departamento de Clínica Infantil (Disciplina de Ortodontia) da Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba -UNICAMP. Esses valores foram comparados com os das grandezas obtidas manualmente (grupo controle), utilizando-se a análise de variância e os testes de Tukey e Friedman. Os resultados demonstraram que das 14 medidas cefalométricas avaliadas, apenas 4 apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significantes: IMPA, 1-NA, FMA, e H-nariz. Concluímos que apesar de a maioria dos valores médios das grandezas cefalométricas não apresentarem diferenças estatisticamente significantes, ao compararmos todos os valores obtidos em cada uma das radiografias, encontramos grande variabilidade nos resultados, o que pode interferir na interpretação das grandezas cefalométricas. Assim, os autores sugerem ao ortodontista, quando receber a documentação ortodôntica, realizar novamente as análises cefalométricas para comparar ...

Comparison among manual and computerized cephalometrics using the softwares dolphin imaging and dentofacial planner

“…Errors are common in cephalometrics and may occur even among experienced operators. Comparative measurements are five times more accurate than the individual identification of cephalometric points [10,11].…”

Locating Cephalometric Landmarks with Multi-Phase Deep Learning

“…Ground truth coordinate values may differ from one plotter to the other. How much error can be clinically and practically allowed is hard to standardize [16,21,22]. In the datasets, we used in this study, there provided two sets of coordinate values ("400_junior" and "400_senior"), plotted by two different practitioners.…”

Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity assessment in patients undergoing orthodontic radiographs

“…Orthodontic radiographs carried out in radiological clinics are essential for diagnosis, planning and control of orthodontic treatment. 1 For example, a lateral cephalometric X-ray must be obtained for all patients, before the start of treatment, when the information obtained from this film is expected to benefit or enhance the formulation of the patient's diagnosis and treatment plan. 2 In the same way, a panoramic X-ray must be obtained for all patients, before the start of treatment, unless there are other suitable radiographs, such as fullmouth periapical radiography, that will enable the orthodontic practitioner to formulate an appropriate diagnosis and treatment plan.…”