1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9138-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Genome Evolution in Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic translocation of genes from plastids to the nucleus -undisputable from the comparison of equivalent prokaryotic and eukaryotic genes and of operons in prokaryotes and plastid chromosomes [25] -must have been accompanied by the acquisition of DNA segments ensuring a proper expression in the nucleo/cytosolic compartment and import of the resulting protein into the organelle. The observation that functionally equivalent plastid import sequences [ 17] and the promotors of the corresponding genes [2,26] reins and genes respectively, but relatively conserved for the same protein/gene in different organisms is indicative of separate phylogenetic transiocation events.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogenetic translocation of genes from plastids to the nucleus -undisputable from the comparison of equivalent prokaryotic and eukaryotic genes and of operons in prokaryotes and plastid chromosomes [25] -must have been accompanied by the acquisition of DNA segments ensuring a proper expression in the nucleo/cytosolic compartment and import of the resulting protein into the organelle. The observation that functionally equivalent plastid import sequences [ 17] and the promotors of the corresponding genes [2,26] reins and genes respectively, but relatively conserved for the same protein/gene in different organisms is indicative of separate phylogenetic transiocation events.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rate of nucleotide substitutions is very low in plant mitochondria (about 10-fold lower than in the nucleus), which should counterbalance the effects of Muller's ratchet (44,45) and negate (for plants) the hypothesis (46) that a nuclear location is favored because it provides relief from the effects of oxygen free radical damage incurred by organellar genes. Selection for a small, compact genome, although perhaps operating in other eukaryotes, is unlikely to be a factor favoring continued gene transfer in plants, because plant mt genomes readily incorporate and retain foreign DNA (8,10,11,47,48) and are very large and mostly noncoding (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Finally, there is the possibility that genes for some organellar proteins may be better regulated in the nucleus (33).…”
Section: Roles Of Selection and Chance In Mitochondrial Gene Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angiosperms have by far the largest mtDNAs, at least 200 kb to over 2,000 kb in size (larger than some bacterial genomes) (7,8). These genomes grow and shrink relatively rapidly; for example, within the cucumber family, mt genome size varies by more than six-fold (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because they capture the complete genome, gene-order data do not suffer from the gene tree vs. species tree problem; and because rearrangements of genes are rare genomic events [19], gene-order data enable the reconstruction of evolutionary events far back in time. Many biologists have embraced this new source of data in their phylogenetic work [7,17,18], while computer scientists are slowly solving the difficult problems posed by the manipulations of these gene orders [16]. Studies conducted by our group [15,26,[29][30][31] confirm that gene-order data support very accurate reconstructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%