2014
DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.138818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008 and 2010 guidelines in interpreting susceptibility of enterobacteriaceae isolates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The isolated strains are treated by Kirby-Bauer (K-B) disk diffusion method or minimum inhibitory concentration method recommended by World Health Organization (WHO). Susceptibility results were determined according to the American Association for Clinical Laboratory Standards [7] . APACHE II score [8] is composed of three parts: Acute Physiology Score (APS), age and Chronic Health Score (CPS); APS deletes the 34 parameters of APACHE, such as plasma osmotic pressure, blood lactic acid concentration, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Glucose (GLU), ALB, Central Venous Pressure (CVP) and urine volume into 12 parameters (all are the worst within the first 24 h after admission to ICU), each item is still 0-4 points and the total score is 0-60 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolated strains are treated by Kirby-Bauer (K-B) disk diffusion method or minimum inhibitory concentration method recommended by World Health Organization (WHO). Susceptibility results were determined according to the American Association for Clinical Laboratory Standards [7] . APACHE II score [8] is composed of three parts: Acute Physiology Score (APS), age and Chronic Health Score (CPS); APS deletes the 34 parameters of APACHE, such as plasma osmotic pressure, blood lactic acid concentration, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Glucose (GLU), ALB, Central Venous Pressure (CVP) and urine volume into 12 parameters (all are the worst within the first 24 h after admission to ICU), each item is still 0-4 points and the total score is 0-60 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial suspensions were made in sterile nutrient broth by colonies from a pure cultures and the turbidity adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards to make a concentration of about 10 7 CFU/mL. Sensitivity to ciprofloxacin was evaluated by the macro-dilution test according the criteria stipulated by the [ 29 ] with serial Ciprofloxacin dilutions of 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128 µg/mL respectively. Results were recorded as minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug susceptibility is assessed based on the guidelines provided by the American Clinical Laboratory Standardization Institute (CLSI) and categorized as sensitive (S), intermediate drug resistance (I), and drug resistance (R). 6 Another method used for drug sensitivity assessment is Kerby-Bauer disk diffusion and AGAR dilution method for confirmation of results or when dealing with atypical bacterial strains, in accordance with the protocols established by the CLSI.…”
Section: Identification and Drug Susceptibility Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%