2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Coal/Biomass Co-processing Systems with CCS for Production of Low-carbon Synthetic Fuels: Methanol-to-Gasoline and Fischer-tropsch

Abstract: Two routes to produce liquid hydrocarbon fuels from solids via synthesis gas are Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis and methanolto-gasoline (MTG). Using a common and detailed process simulation and cost analysis framework, this paper compares the performance and cost of FT and MTG processes on a self-consistent basis. In particular, FT and MTG production from coal and coal/biomass co-feeds are compared, including detailed mass, energy and carbon balances, fuel-cycle-wide GHG emissions, and prospective capital and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Recent papers utilizing fixed topologies have incorporated synthesis gas conversion into methanol and subsequently methanol-to-gasoline technologies. [35][36][37] Motivated by the same reasons outlined above, several researchers have investigated these systems via an optimization based superstructure approach. Chen et al, proposed a nonlinear programming model that coproduced power and liquid fuels, and maximized the net present value of such polygeneration systems.…”
Section: Hybrid Energy Systems Utilizing Coal and Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…49 Recent papers utilizing fixed topologies have incorporated synthesis gas conversion into methanol and subsequently methanol-to-gasoline technologies. [35][36][37] Motivated by the same reasons outlined above, several researchers have investigated these systems via an optimization based superstructure approach. Chen et al, proposed a nonlinear programming model that coproduced power and liquid fuels, and maximized the net present value of such polygeneration systems.…”
Section: Hybrid Energy Systems Utilizing Coal and Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several competing upgrading schemes also exist that vary the yields of the fuel products. Liu et al 35 compares the Fischer-Tropsch and methanol-to-gasoline processes in this context through the use of fixed topologies. However, the syngas conversion alternatives for hydrocarbon, heat, electricity, and hydrogen production ( Figure 4) produces semi-infinitely many process designs due to existence of various alternatives and split decisions.…”
Section: Hydrocarbon Production/upgradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coal is the most abundant fossil energy on Earth, which can be used to prepare coke [1], aromatics [2], methane [3][4][5], methanol [6], ammonia [7], gasoline [8] and other chemical products through coking, gasification and liquefaction. Among them, the process of coal gasification to methane has been extensively studied in recent years [9][10][11], due to its high energy conversion efficiency, short process flow and low equipment investment of unit product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies referred to hydrogen production from co‐gasification of biomass and coal with in situ CO 2 capture , . Therefore, the purpose of this work is to study the influence of operational variables such as coal/biomass ratio ( C/B ), steam/fuel ratio ( S/F ), and fuel particle size ( d p ) on gas composition and performance parameters during co‐gasification of biomass and coal blended with CaO as a CO 2 sorbent in a circulating fluidized‐bed (CFB) reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%