Comparison of comfort, recovery and discharge times of sodium thiopental and propofol anesthesia in pediatric patients who underwent outpatient anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging

Adas, Cemil; Adas, Hilal; Ergun, Gul; Aydin, Neşe; Kurt, Nurettin; Gül, Fethi; Utku, Uygar; Pişkin, Özcan

doi:10.5505/jkartaltr.2013.57704

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…22 Doğanay ve ark., çocuklarda MRG uygulamalarında rektal midazolamın etkinliğini karşılaştırdıkları çalışmada, işlem öncesine göre işlem sonrasında nabız ve satürasyon değerlerinin düşük olduğunu bildirmişlerdir. 23 Ça-lışmamızda, oksijen desteği verdiğimiz için kaydedilen nabız ve satürasyon değerlerinde anestezi sırasında artış gözlenmiştir.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Retrospective Analysis of Anesthesia Applications With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Gürbüz¹,

Kol²,

Avcı³

et al. 2018

Turkiye Klinikleri J Cardiovasc Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionunclassified

Retrospective Analysis of Anesthesia Applications With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Gürbüz¹,

Kol²,

Avcı³

et al. 2018

Turkiye Klinikleri J Cardiovasc Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although both groups did not distinguish the cases with ideal sedation, they reported that the treatment was canceled due to the weak sedation in the thiopental group and as a result more effective sedation was formed with propofol. Adas et al (12) found that the duration of readiness for MRI was 2.34 ± 1.10 min in the thiopental group, 17.06 ± 7.81 min in the treatment time and 20.91 ± 7.14 min in the rest periods in ASA I-III MRI-, the total treatment time was 40.31 ± 9.61 min. In the propofol group, these values were determined as 0.98 ± 0.54 min, 18.39 ± 10.06 min, 17.34 ± 4.28 min and 36.70 ± 10.44 min, respectively.…”

Section: Dıscussıonmentioning

confidence: 95%

Comparison of Propofol and Thiopental in Sedation of Children for MRI Procedure

Geyik¹

2019

jmscr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aım: Children who will be sedated for MRI was compared about the propofol and thiopental application. Materıal and Methods: ASA I-II, 160 cases between 1 month and 8 years old were included. Initial systolicblood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate, oxygen saturation (SPO2) values were recorded. Group I: Propofol 2 mg / kg bolus, Group II: Thiopental sodium 2 mg / kg bolus. The University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) was used to determine the sedation level. Age, sex, body weight, ASA, MRI region, total amount of drug used were recorded. The technician performing MRI evaluated the quality of the shots with a verbal scoring system ranging from 1 to 3. Results: The total dose given to the males was 43.6 ± 20 mg and the females were 38.3 ± 18 mg. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.944). In terms of processing time, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.09). UMSS averaged 2.81 in Group I and 2.60 in Group II, with a statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.003). There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of side effects, desaturation, prolonged sedation and nausea and vomiting (p <0.05). Conclusıon: Because of the minimal side effects and rapid induction, propofol was under the control of anesthesiologist. Unlike our previous literature, it could be used effectively and reliably even in younger infants.

show abstract

Comparison of comfort, recovery and discharge times of sodium thiopental and propofol anesthesia in pediatric patients who underwent outpatient anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Retrospective Analysis of Anesthesia Applications With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Retrospective Analysis of Anesthesia Applications With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Comparison of Propofol and Thiopental in Sedation of Children for MRI Procedure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About