1998
DOI: 10.1177/104063879801000312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Conventional and Delayed Secondary Enrichment for Isolation of Salmonella Spp. from Swine Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the results from previous studies, which showed that DSE improves the recovery of Salmonella from poultry and poultry environments, 22,23,25 swine and swine environments, 5,16,18 and cattle. 17 The basis for the enhanced isolation of Salmonella with DSE is not clear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is consistent with the results from previous studies, which showed that DSE improves the recovery of Salmonella from poultry and poultry environments, 22,23,25 swine and swine environments, 5,16,18 and cattle. 17 The basis for the enhanced isolation of Salmonella with DSE is not clear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The primary objective of the studies reported here was to compare the protocols routinely used in the two laboratories which have collectively participated in most studies of Salmonella in swine in the USA published recently. Additional objectives were to compare temperatures for enrichment in Rappaport–Vassiliadis broth (37 vs 42 °C) and to evaluate further delayed secondary enrichment (DSE) with swine faecal samples ( Nietfield et al . 1998 ; O'Carroll et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tetrathionate is considered more inhibitory than GN Hajna in that it restricts competing microorganisms from the gastrointestinal tract, and it has been proposed as the enrichment of choice when culturing fecal samples. 5,9,11 It has been suggested that GN Hajna is superior to other primary enrichments for isolation of S. choleraesuis, 1,2,6-8 hence the rationale for evaluating both enrichments in our study. When GN Hajna and tetrathionate were compared as initial enrichments in a previous study, 1 GN Hajna demonstrated a significant advantage over tetrathionate for S. choleraesuis recovery from rectal swabs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,6-8 However, when culturing for salmonellae other than Salmonella Choleraesuis, tetrathionate broth has been routinely utilized for enrichment. 5,9,11 A survey was conducted to determine the prevalence of salmonellae at slaughter in pigs from 5 farms from an integrated swine operation. Because there was no prior history of salmonellae isolations from these farms, there was no predictability for serotypes of salmonellae that might be recovered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%